PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
WMT vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between WMT and COST is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

WMT vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Walmart Inc. (WMT) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

5,000.00%10,000.00%15,000.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
3,644.25%
15,588.36%
WMT
COST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WMT:

4.81

COST:

2.43

Sortino Ratio

WMT:

7.00

COST:

3.01

Omega Ratio

WMT:

1.92

COST:

1.43

Calmar Ratio

WMT:

9.12

COST:

4.45

Martin Ratio

WMT:

54.30

COST:

11.50

Ulcer Index

WMT:

1.53%

COST:

3.97%

Daily Std Dev

WMT:

17.30%

COST:

18.82%

Max Drawdown

WMT:

-77.24%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

WMT:

-2.03%

COST:

-3.01%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WMT:

$766.55B

COST:

$435.99B

EPS

WMT:

$2.42

COST:

$16.98

PE Ratio

WMT:

39.43

COST:

57.84

PEG Ratio

WMT:

2.87

COST:

5.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

WMT:

$673.82B

COST:

$258.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WMT:

$166.41B

COST:

$32.80B

EBITDA (TTM)

WMT:

$38.20B

COST:

$12.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMT achieves a 80.15% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 47.01% return. Over the past 10 years, WMT has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 14.98%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.77% annualized return.


WMT

YTD

80.15%

1M

11.51%

6M

39.09%

1Y

82.61%

5Y*

20.32%

10Y*

14.98%

COST

YTD

47.01%

1M

4.92%

6M

11.10%

1Y

46.43%

5Y*

29.02%

10Y*

23.77%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WMT vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Walmart Inc. (WMT) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WMT, currently valued at 4.81, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.812.43
The chart of Sortino ratio for WMT, currently valued at 7.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.007.003.01
The chart of Omega ratio for WMT, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.921.43
The chart of Calmar ratio for WMT, currently valued at 9.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.009.124.45
The chart of Martin ratio for WMT, currently valued at 54.30, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0054.3011.50
WMT
COST

The current WMT Sharpe Ratio is 4.81, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMT and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.003.004.005.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.81
2.43
WMT
COST

Dividends

WMT vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than COST's 2.02% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.89%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%2.24%2.39%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
2.02%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%1.01%

Drawdowns

WMT vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMT drawdown since its inception was -77.24%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMT and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-2.03%
-3.01%
WMT
COST

Volatility

WMT vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Walmart Inc. (WMT) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.79%. This indicates that WMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.60%
4.79%
WMT
COST

Financials

WMT vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Walmart Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab