WMT vs. FNGO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

WMT (Walmart Inc.) is a stock, while FNGO (MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%). Over the past 5 years, WMT returned 22.47%/yr vs 27.19%/yr for FNGO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WMT vs. FNGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Walmart Inc. (WMT) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMT achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly lower than FNGO's 13.62% return.

WMT

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -8.13%
• YTD: 7.98%
• 6M: 6.15%
• 1Y: 23.97%
• 3Y*: 34.37%
• 5Y*: 22.47%
• 10Y*: 19.62%

FNGO

• 1D: 2.55%
• 1M: -1.56%
• YTD: 13.62%
• 6M: 2.77%
• 1Y: 33.20%
• 3Y*: 54.61%
• 5Y*: 27.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMT vs. FNGO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
WMT Walmart Inc.	7.98%	24.49%	73.99%	12.88%	-0.46%	1.97%	23.32%	30.16%	6.13%
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	13.62%	25.49%	101.65%	240.10%	-71.55%	28.38%	238.00%	79.61%	-40.52%

Correlation

The correlation between WMT and FNGO is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018	0.20

The correlation between WMT and FNGO shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WMT vs. FNGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMT

WMT Risk / Return Rank: 71
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FNGO

FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 23
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMT vs. FNGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Walmart Inc. (WMT) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WMT	FNGO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	0.81	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	1.29	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.16	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	0.78	+0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.02	2.04	+2.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WMT vs. FNGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the FNGO Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMT and FNGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WMT	FNGO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.02	0.81	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	0.45	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.63	+0.01

Drawdowns

WMT vs. FNGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMT drawdown since its inception was -77.14%, roughly equal to the maximum FNGO drawdown of -78.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMT and FNGO.

Drawdown Indicators

	WMT	FNGO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.14%	-78.39%	+1.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.75%	-42.73%	+26.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.93%	-47.64%	+25.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.74%	-78.39%	+52.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.71%	-14.93%	+4.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.63%	-23.89%	+9.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.79%	16.28%	-11.49%

Volatility

WMT vs. FNGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Walmart Inc. (WMT) is 10.26%, while MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) has a volatility of 17.22%. This indicates that WMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WMT	FNGO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.26%	17.22%	-6.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.59%	32.93%	-14.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.72%	41.39%	-17.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.68%	60.45%	-38.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.73%	61.64%	-39.91%

Dividends

WMT vs. FNGO - Dividend Comparison

WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while FNGO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WMT Walmart Inc.	0.81%	0.84%	0.92%	1.45%	1.58%	1.52%	1.50%	1.78%	2.23%	2.07%	2.89%	3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WMT and FNGO in my portfolio?

WMT and FNGO have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WMT or FNGO?

FNGO has higher volatility (17.22%) compared to WMT (10.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMT dropped -77.14% vs FNGO's -78.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.