WMCVX vs. RPMGX

In the year-to-date period, WMCVX achieves a -8.11% return, which is significantly lower than RPMGX's -2.97% return. Over the past 10 years, WMCVX has underperformed RPMGX with an annualized return of 8.29%, while RPMGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.10% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WMCVX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than RPMGX's 0.72% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) and T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WMCVX Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the RPMGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMCVX and RPMGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

WMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.70%, more than RPMGX's 10.53% yield.

The maximum WMCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.79%, which is greater than RPMGX's maximum drawdown of -54.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMCVX and RPMGX.

Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) at 5.48%. This indicates that WMCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.