RPMGX vs. VOO

In the year-to-date period, RPMGX achieves a -8.60% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -6.43% return. Over the past 10 years, RPMGX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 1.22%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.02% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RPMGX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RPMGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPMGX and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RPMGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%.

The maximum RPMGX drawdown since its inception was -58.69%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPMGX and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 13.53% and 13.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.