RPMGX vs. PRWAX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) and T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities Fund (PRWAX).
RPMGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 30, 1992. PRWAX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 30, 1985.
Performance
RPMGX vs. PRWAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RPMGX vs. PRWAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPMGX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund | -6.67% | 10.55% | 21.08% | 20.27% | -22.51% | 14.94% | 24.16% | 31.53% | -2.12% | 24.80% |
PRWAX T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities Fund | -12.37% | 26.78% | 25.24% | 29.02% | -21.37% | 20.63% | 44.73% | 35.08% | 1.26% | 34.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPMGX achieves a -6.67% return, which is significantly higher than PRWAX's -12.37% return. Over the past 10 years, RPMGX has underperformed PRWAX with an annualized return of 10.97%, while PRWAX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.
RPMGX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -9.25%
- YTD
- -6.67%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 11.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.90%
- 5Y*
- 5.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
PRWAX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -9.15%
- YTD
- -12.37%
- 6M
- -3.78%
- 1Y
- 16.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RPMGX vs. PRWAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPMGX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than PRWAX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RPMGX vs. PRWAX — Risk / Return Rank
RPMGX
PRWAX
RPMGX vs. PRWAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) and T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities Fund (PRWAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPMGX | PRWAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.57 | 0.87 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 1.42 | -0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.20 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 1.02 | -0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 3.79 | -0.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPMGX | PRWAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 0.87 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.58 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.90 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.59 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between RPMGX and PRWAX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RPMGX vs. PRWAX - Dividend Comparison
RPMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.61%, less than PRWAX's 19.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPMGX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 13.61% | 12.70% | 20.43% | 6.35% | 2.60% | 10.52% | 4.53% | 5.29% | 12.12% | 8.04% | 3.45% | 9.51% |
PRWAX T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities Fund | 19.01% | 16.66% | 9.22% | 5.10% | 3.11% | 20.51% | 15.44% | 7.01% | 12.58% | 12.30% | 6.19% | 8.84% |
Drawdowns
RPMGX vs. PRWAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPMGX drawdown since its inception was -54.66%, roughly equal to the maximum PRWAX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPMGX and PRWAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPMGX | PRWAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.66% | -55.06% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.47% | -14.05% | +1.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.08% | -29.38% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.96% | -30.50% | -5.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.21% | -14.05% | +3.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -9.92% | +2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 3.79% | -0.67% |
Volatility
RPMGX vs. PRWAX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) and T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities Fund (PRWAX) have volatilities of 4.76% and 4.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RPMGX | PRWAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 4.90% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.48% | 12.45% | -0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.56% | 19.42% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 17.88% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 18.82% | +0.22% |