WMCVX vs. VB

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

WMCVX (Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, WMCVX returned 10.81%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for VB. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WMCVX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.

Performance

WMCVX vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMCVX achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 15.68% return. Over the past 10 years, WMCVX has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 10.81%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.79% annualized return.

WMCVX

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: 5.01%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 6M: 9.58%
• 1Y: 17.31%
• 3Y*: 13.00%
• 5Y*: 5.75%
• 10Y*: 10.81%

VB

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 2.83%
• YTD: 15.68%
• 6M: 13.00%
• 1Y: 30.17%
• 3Y*: 17.54%
• 5Y*: 7.39%
• 10Y*: 11.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMCVX vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WMCVX Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund	12.39%	-3.66%	11.65%	31.78%	-21.61%	25.23%	12.52%	23.63%	-9.55%	19.54%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	15.68%	8.87%	14.17%	18.22%	-17.51%	17.57%	19.19%	27.34%	-9.34%	16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between WMCVX and VB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004	0.94

The correlation between WMCVX and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WMCVX vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMCVX

WMCVX Risk / Return Rank: 14
WMCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
WMCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
WMCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
WMCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
WMCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

VB

VB Risk / Return Rank: 60
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 52
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMCVX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WMCVX	VB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	1.82	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	2.59	-1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.31	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	3.38	-1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.94	12.38	-8.44

WMCVX vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMCVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMCVX and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WMCVX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.79%, which is greater than VB's maximum drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMCVX and VB.

Drawdown Indicators

	WMCVX	VB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.79%	-59.56%	-6.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.06%	-8.98%	-3.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.75%	-25.36%	-3.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.26%	-28.15%	-4.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.29%	-42.05%	-4.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.76%	-0.39%	-2.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.94%	-8.42%	-2.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.34%	2.44%	+1.90%

Volatility

WMCVX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 4.92%. This indicates that WMCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WMCVX	VB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.43%	4.92%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.84%	12.21%	+1.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.89%	16.66%	+2.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.59%	20.78%	+1.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.50%	21.45%	+2.05%

WMCVX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMCVX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

WMCVX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

WMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, more than VB's 1.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	1.18%	1.33%	1.30%	1.55%	1.59%	1.24%	1.14%	1.39%	1.67%	1.35%	1.50%	1.48%
WMCVX Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund	5.51%	6.19%	17.18%	3.67%	2.39%	7.72%	0.00%	1.10%	8.98%	6.63%	0.07%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WMCVX and VB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, WMCVX and VB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, WMCVX or VB?

WMCVX has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to VB (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMCVX dropped -65.79% vs VB's -59.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.