WMCVX vs. VB
WMCVX (Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, WMCVX returned 10.30%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for VB. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. WMCVX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VB.
Performance
WMCVX vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMCVX achieves a 13.95% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 15.19% return. Over the past 10 years, WMCVX has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 10.30%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.08% annualized return.
WMCVX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 6.35%
- YTD
- 13.95%
- 1Y
- 15.27%
- 3Y*
- 10.16%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.11%
VB
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- 6M
- 10.09%
- YTD
- 15.19%
- 1Y
- 25.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $121.48M | $119.40M | $165.11M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
WMCVX vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMCVX Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund | 13.95% | -3.66% | 11.65% | 31.78% | -21.61% | 25.23% | 12.52% | 23.63% | -9.55% | 19.54% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 15.19% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMCVX and VB is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.94 |
The correlation between WMCVX and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMCVX vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
WMCVX
VB
WMCVX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMCVX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.26 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 2.67 | -1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | 9.73 | -6.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMCVX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.79%, which is greater than VB's maximum drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMCVX and VB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMCVX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.79% | -59.56% | -6.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.06% | -8.98% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.75% | -25.36% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.26% | -28.15% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.29% | -42.05% | -4.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -2.63% | +1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.91% | -8.39% | -2.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 2.46% | +1.89% |
Volatility
WMCVX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 3.36%. This indicates that WMCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMCVX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 3.36% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.38% | 12.01% | +1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.73% | 16.47% | +2.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.51% | 20.69% | +1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.45% | 21.37% | +2.08% |
WMCVX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMCVX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMCVX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
WMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.43%, more than VB's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
WMCVX Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund | 5.43% | 6.19% | 17.18% | 3.67% | 2.39% | 7.72% | 0.00% | 1.10% | 8.98% | 6.63% | 0.07% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMCVX and VB have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WMCVX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to VB (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMCVX dropped -65.79% vs VB's -59.56%.
VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WMCVX and VB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer