WMCVX vs. FMILX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

WMCVX (Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund) and FMILX (Fidelity New Millennium Fund) are both mutual funds - WMCVX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Wasatch, while FMILX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, WMCVX returned 10.31%/yr vs 15.12%/yr for FMILX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WMCVX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FMILX.

Performance

WMCVX vs. FMILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) and Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMCVX achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly lower than FMILX's 12.72% return. Over the past 10 years, WMCVX has underperformed FMILX with an annualized return of 10.31%, while FMILX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.12% annualized return.

WMCVX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -1.43%
• YTD: 7.48%
• 6M: 7.36%
• 1Y: 13.18%
• 3Y*: 12.91%
• 5Y*: 4.02%
• 10Y*: 10.31%

FMILX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 5.76%
• YTD: 12.72%
• 6M: 9.36%
• 1Y: 24.46%
• 3Y*: 22.76%
• 5Y*: 15.36%
• 10Y*: 15.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMCVX vs. FMILX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WMCVX Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund	7.48%	-3.66%	11.65%	31.78%	-21.61%	25.23%	12.52%	23.63%	-9.55%	19.54%
FMILX Fidelity New Millennium Fund	12.72%	12.97%	28.83%	25.37%	-1.56%	23.92%	5.73%	26.17%	-6.31%	19.00%

Correlation

The correlation between WMCVX and FMILX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1997	0.80

The correlation between WMCVX and FMILX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.83 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WMCVX vs. FMILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMCVX

WMCVX Risk / Return Rank: 9
WMCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
WMCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
WMCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
WMCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
WMCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

FMILX

FMILX Risk / Return Rank: 36
FMILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FMILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FMILX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FMILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FMILX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMCVX vs. FMILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) and Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WMCVX	FMILX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.69	1.80	-1.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.14	2.37	-1.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.34	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.00	2.16	-1.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.79	7.83	-5.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WMCVX vs. FMILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMCVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the FMILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMCVX and FMILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WMCVX	FMILX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69	1.80	-1.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18	0.91	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.84	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.63	-0.12

Drawdowns

WMCVX vs. FMILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.79%, which is greater than FMILX's maximum drawdown of -58.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMCVX and FMILX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WMCVX	FMILX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.79%	-58.56%	-7.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.06%	-11.86%	-0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.75%	-20.48%	-8.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.26%	-20.48%	-11.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.29%	-38.92%	-7.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.01%	0.00%	-7.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.95%	-12.45%	+1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.32%	3.26%	+1.06%

Volatility

WMCVX vs. FMILX - Volatility Comparison

Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX) at 3.62%. This indicates that WMCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WMCVX	FMILX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.53%	3.62%	+1.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.41%	11.68%	+1.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.62%	14.24%	+4.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.56%	16.89%	+5.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.47%	18.02%	+5.45%

WMCVX vs. FMILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMCVX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FMILX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

WMCVX vs. FMILX - Dividend Comparison

WMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, while FMILX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMILX Fidelity New Millennium Fund	0.00%	0.00%	3.64%	3.87%	4.19%	8.25%	8.60%	4.72%	18.25%	7.84%	6.65%	11.99%
WMCVX Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund	5.76%	6.19%	17.18%	3.67%	2.39%	7.72%	0.00%	1.10%	8.98%	6.63%	0.07%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WMCVX and FMILX in my portfolio?

WMCVX and FMILX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WMCVX or FMILX?

WMCVX has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to FMILX (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMCVX dropped -65.79% vs FMILX's -58.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.