PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMCVX vs. USNQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMCVX vs. USNQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) and USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMCVX achieves a 8.15% return, which is significantly lower than USNQX's 21.19% return. Over the past 10 years, WMCVX has underperformed USNQX with an annualized return of 10.38%, while USNQX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.64% annualized return.


WMCVX

1D
-0.51%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
8.15%
6M
6.68%
1Y
11.90%
3Y*
13.15%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
10.38%

USNQX

1D
-0.29%
1M
9.17%
YTD
21.19%
6M
19.57%
1Y
41.10%
3Y*
28.54%
5Y*
17.67%
10Y*
21.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMCVX vs. USNQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WMCVX
Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund
8.15%-3.66%11.65%31.78%-21.61%25.23%12.52%23.63%-9.55%19.54%
USNQX
USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund
21.19%20.52%25.42%54.46%-32.71%26.82%48.31%38.86%-0.43%32.30%

Correlation

The correlation between WMCVX and USNQX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2000

0.71

The correlation between WMCVX and USNQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMCVX vs. USNQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMCVX
WMCVX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
WMCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
WMCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

USNQX
USNQX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
USNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
USNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
USNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
USNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMCVX vs. USNQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) and USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WMCVXUSNQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.44

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

3.45

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.81

13.21

-10.40

WMCVX vs. USNQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMCVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the USNQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMCVX and USNQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WMCVXUSNQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

2.59

-1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.78

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.96

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.37

+0.14

Drawdowns

WMCVX vs. USNQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.79%, smaller than the maximum USNQX drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMCVX and USNQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMCVXUSNQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.79%

-76.24%

+10.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.06%

-12.07%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.75%

-22.88%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.26%

-36.95%

+4.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.29%

-36.95%

-9.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.43%

-0.29%

-6.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.95%

-26.75%

+15.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

3.15%

+1.18%

Volatility

WMCVX vs. USNQX - Volatility Comparison

Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) at 4.53%. This indicates that WMCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USNQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMCVXUSNQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

4.53%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.46%

12.19%

+1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.62%

16.09%

+2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.56%

22.90%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.47%

22.66%

+0.81%

WMCVX vs. USNQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMCVX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than USNQX's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMCVX vs. USNQX - Dividend Comparison

WMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, more than USNQX's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USNQX
USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund
2.49%3.01%2.19%2.60%4.13%4.48%1.53%0.88%0.69%1.97%0.50%2.73%
WMCVX
Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund
5.72%6.19%17.18%3.67%2.39%7.72%0.00%1.10%8.98%6.63%0.07%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


WMCVX and USNQX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMCVX has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to USNQX (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMCVX dropped -65.79% vs USNQX's -76.24%.

USNQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMCVX and USNQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer