WMB vs. QBTS
WMB (The Williams Companies, Inc.) and QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) are both stocks. WMB operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while QBTS operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 3 years, WMB returned 38.58%/yr vs 123.62%/yr for QBTS. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WMB vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMB achieves a 21.67% return, which is significantly higher than QBTS's -10.63% return.
WMB
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- YTD
- 21.67%
- 6M
- 22.42%
- 1Y
- 24.40%
- 3Y*
- 38.58%
- 5Y*
- 26.67%
- 10Y*
- 19.28%
QBTS
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 14.84%
- YTD
- -10.63%
- 6M
- -10.46%
- 1Y
- 54.05%
- 3Y*
- 123.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WMB vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 21.67% | 14.91% | 62.35% | 11.86% | 4.75% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | -10.63% | 211.31% | 854.44% | -38.88% | -83.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMB and QBTS is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
WMB:
$88.15B
QBTS:
$8.59B
WMB:
$2.28
QBTS:
-$1.08
WMB:
7.39
QBTS:
637.12
WMB:
6.80
QBTS:
7.64
WMB:
$11.92B
QBTS:
$12.44M
WMB:
$7.49B
QBTS:
$8.25M
WMB:
$6.88B
QBTS:
-$399.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMB vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank
WMB
QBTS
WMB vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMB | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.16 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 0.67 | +1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.27 | 1.16 | +3.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMB vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMB drawdown since its inception was -98.03%, roughly equal to the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMB and QBTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMB | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.03% | -96.67% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.36% | -71.01% | +58.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.36% | -79.17% | +66.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.55% | -47.81% | +39.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.07% | -65.66% | +38.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.82% | 40.64% | -34.82% |
Volatility
WMB vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) is 7.36%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 42.66%. This indicates that WMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMB | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.36% | 42.66% | -35.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.58% | 76.89% | -61.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.00% | 108.46% | -85.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.62% | 150.99% | -127.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.95% | 150.99% | -120.04% |
Dividends
WMB vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison
WMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, while QBTS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 2.84% | 3.33% | 3.51% | 5.14% | 5.17% | 6.30% | 7.98% | 6.41% | 6.17% | 3.94% | 5.39% | 9.53% |
Financials
WMB vs. QBTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Williams Companies, Inc. and D-Wave Quantum Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
WMB and QBTS have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTS has higher volatility (42.66%) compared to WMB (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMB dropped -98.03% vs QBTS's -96.67%.
WMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WMB and QBTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer