QBTS vs. QUBT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT).

Performance

QBTS vs. QUBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QBTS vs. QUBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc	-47.61%	211.31%	854.44%	-38.88%	-85.60%
QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc.	-35.28%	-38.01%	1,712.51%	-39.53%	-60.98%

Fundamentals

Market Cap QBTS : $4.84B QUBT : $1.43B
EPS QBTS : -$1.08 QUBT : -$0.11
PS Ratio QBTS : 183.79 QUBT : 1.70K
PB Ratio QBTS : 5.67 QUBT : 0.90
Total Revenue (TTM) QBTS : $24.59M QUBT : $682.00K
Gross Profit (TTM) QBTS : $20.31M QUBT : $67.00K
EBITDA (TTM) QBTS : -$345.51M QUBT : -$36.20M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTS achieves a -47.61% return, which is significantly lower than QUBT's -35.28% return.

QBTS

• 1D: -5.06%
• 1M: -27.67%
• YTD: -47.61%
• 6M: -46.55%
• 1Y: 84.64%
• 3Y*: 174.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QUBT

• 1D: -3.07%
• 1M: -22.70%
• YTD: -35.28%
• 6M: -65.00%
• 1Y: -14.43%
• 3Y*: 71.78%
• 5Y*: -1.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

QBTS vs. QUBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBTS

QBTS Risk / Return Rank: 68
QBTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
QBTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QBTS Omega Ratio Rank: 69
QBTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QBTS Martin Ratio Rank: 63

QUBT

QUBT Risk / Return Rank: 38
QUBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
QUBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
QUBT Omega Ratio Rank: 42
QUBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
QUBT Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBTS vs. QUBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QBTS	QUBT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	-0.13	+0.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	0.70	+1.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.07	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.13	-0.23	+1.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.37	-0.42	+2.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QBTS vs. QUBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBTS Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the QUBT Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBTS and QUBT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QBTS	QUBT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	-0.13	+0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.02	+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between QBTS and QUBT is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

QBTS vs. QUBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither QBTS nor QUBT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

QBTS vs. QUBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTS drawdown since its inception was -96.67%, roughly equal to the maximum QUBT drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTS and QUBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBTS	QUBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.67%	-97.53%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-71.01%	-74.37%	+3.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-95.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-69.41%	-74.14%	+4.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.49%	-73.24%	+6.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.85%	40.75%	-6.90%

Volatility

QBTS vs. QUBT - Volatility Comparison

D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a higher volatility of 20.52% compared to Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) at 17.25%. This indicates that QBTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QBTS	QUBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.52%	17.25%	+3.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	78.03%	70.90%	+7.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	117.73%	114.38%	+3.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	151.96%	134.20%	+17.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	151.96%	179.10%	-27.14%

Financials