PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WLDN vs. MTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WLDN vs. MTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) and MasTec, Inc. (MTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLDN achieves a -5.56% return, which is significantly lower than MTZ's 72.39% return. Over the past 10 years, WLDN has underperformed MTZ with an annualized return of 25.60%, while MTZ has yielded a comparatively higher 31.87% annualized return.


WLDN

1D
0.99%
1M
27.72%
YTD
-5.56%
6M
-6.89%
1Y
72.27%
3Y*
74.83%
5Y*
20.09%
10Y*
25.60%

MTZ

1D
1.37%
1M
-14.35%
YTD
72.39%
6M
71.02%
1Y
137.73%
3Y*
52.21%
5Y*
25.69%
10Y*
31.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLDN vs. MTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WLDN
Willdan Group, Inc.
-5.56%172.14%77.16%20.45%-49.29%-15.59%31.21%-9.15%46.12%5.98%
MTZ
MasTec, Inc.
72.39%59.67%79.79%-11.26%-7.53%35.35%6.27%58.19%-17.14%27.97%

Correlation

The correlation between WLDN and MTZ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2006

0.22

The correlation between WLDN and MTZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WLDN:

$1.51B

MTZ:

$29.52B

EPS

WLDN:

$3.71

MTZ:

$5.71

PE Ratio

WLDN:

26.38

MTZ:

65.62

PEG Ratio

WLDN:

0.42

MTZ:

0.62

PS Ratio

WLDN:

2.17

MTZ:

1.93

PB Ratio

WLDN:

4.85

MTZ:

8.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

WLDN:

$684.28M

MTZ:

$15.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WLDN:

$261.18M

MTZ:

$1.85B

EBITDA (TTM)

WLDN:

$64.86M

MTZ:

$1.10B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WLDN vs. MTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLDN
WLDN Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
WLDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLDN Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
WLDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLDN Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

MTZ
MTZ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
MTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
MTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLDN vs. MTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) and MasTec, Inc. (MTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WLDNMTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.52

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

8.04

-6.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.10

25.92

-22.82

WLDN vs. MTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLDN Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the MTZ Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLDN and MTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WLDNMTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

3.62

-2.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.61

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.73

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.20

-0.01

Drawdowns

WLDN vs. MTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLDN drawdown since its inception was -89.19%, smaller than the maximum MTZ drawdown of -97.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDN and MTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WLDNMTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.19%

-97.72%

+8.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.41%

-17.24%

-33.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.41%

-61.01%

+10.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.59%

-61.01%

-11.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.71%

-67.92%

-10.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.45%

-14.35%

-13.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.37%

-51.90%

+9.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.40%

5.33%

+18.07%

Volatility

WLDN vs. MTZ - Volatility Comparison

Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) has a higher volatility of 19.58% compared to MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) at 11.98%. This indicates that WLDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WLDNMTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.58%

11.98%

+7.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.99%

29.11%

+21.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.15%

38.36%

+26.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.92%

42.56%

+13.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.17%

43.74%

+10.43%

Dividends

WLDN vs. MTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither WLDN nor MTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

WLDN vs. MTZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Willdan Group, Inc. and MasTec, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
155.11M
3.83B
(WLDN) Total Revenue
(MTZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WLDN vs. MTZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Willdan Group, Inc. and MasTec, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
40.7%
12.5%
Portfolio components
WLDN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willdan Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 63.16M and revenue of 155.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.7%.

MTZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported a gross profit of 477.90M and revenue of 3.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.5%.

WLDN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willdan Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.29M and revenue of 155.11M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.

MTZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported an operating income of 141.80M and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

WLDN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willdan Group, Inc. reported a net income of 8.53M and revenue of 155.11M, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.

MTZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported a net income of 60.84M and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WLDN and MTZ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WLDN has higher volatility (19.58%) compared to MTZ (11.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLDN dropped -89.19% vs MTZ's -97.72%.

MTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WLDN and MTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer