WLDN vs. JBL
WLDN (Willdan Group, Inc.) and JBL (Jabil Inc.) are both stocks. WLDN operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while JBL operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, WLDN returned 20.58%/yr vs 32.67%/yr for JBL. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WLDN vs. JBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLDN achieves a -33.89% return, which is significantly lower than JBL's 38.24% return. Over the past 10 years, WLDN has underperformed JBL with an annualized return of 20.58%, while JBL has yielded a comparatively higher 32.67% annualized return.
WLDN
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- -10.18%
- 6M
- -45.70%
- YTD
- -33.89%
- 1Y
- -18.42%
- 3Y*
- 49.87%
- 5Y*
- 10.69%
- 10Y*
- 20.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.21%
JBL
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- 6M
- 32.90%
- YTD
- 38.24%
- 1Y
- 44.34%
- 3Y*
- 42.76%
- 5Y*
- 39.99%
- 10Y*
- 32.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
JBL Jabil Inc. | $328.00M | $358.66M | $472.99M |
| $15.08M | $19.41M | $31.57M |
WLDN vs. JBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLDN Willdan Group, Inc. | -33.89% | 172.14% | 77.16% | 20.45% | -49.29% | -15.59% | 31.21% | -9.15% | 46.12% | 5.98% |
JBL Jabil Inc. | 38.24% | 58.73% | 13.25% | 87.43% | -2.55% | 66.40% | 3.89% | 68.49% | -4.41% | 12.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLDN and JBL is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2006 | 0.22 |
The correlation between WLDN and JBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WLDN:
$1.04B
JBL:
$33.01B
WLDN:
$3.69
JBL:
$7.99
WLDN:
18.58
JBL:
39.44
WLDN:
0.29
JBL:
2.11
WLDN:
1.53
JBL:
1.01
WLDN:
3.40
JBL:
25.36
WLDN:
$684.28M
JBL:
$33.59B
WLDN:
$261.18M
JBL:
$3.10B
WLDN:
$64.86M
JBL:
$1.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLDN vs. JBL — Risk / Return Rank
WLDN
JBL
WLDN vs. JBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) and Jabil Inc. (JBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WLDN | JBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.18 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 1.63 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 4.81 | -5.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WLDN vs. JBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLDN drawdown since its inception was -89.19%, smaller than the maximum JBL drawdown of -94.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDN and JBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLDN | JBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.19% | -94.92% | +5.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.41% | -25.54% | -24.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.41% | -36.83% | -13.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.59% | -36.83% | -35.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.71% | -57.34% | -21.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.21% | -18.30% | -30.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.35% | -44.36% | +2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.45% | 8.62% | +19.83% |
Volatility
WLDN vs. JBL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) is 10.31%, while Jabil Inc. (JBL) has a volatility of 16.74%. This indicates that WLDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLDN | JBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.31% | 16.74% | -6.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.69% | 35.11% | +14.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.50% | 44.42% | +21.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.04% | 38.61% | +17.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.22% | 37.39% | +16.83% |
Dividends
WLDN vs. JBL - Dividend Comparison
WLDN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBL Jabil Inc. | 0.10% | 0.14% | 0.22% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 0.45% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.29% | 1.22% | 1.35% | 1.37% |
WLDN Willdan Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
WLDN vs. JBL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Willdan Group, Inc. and Jabil Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WLDN vs. JBL - Profitability Comparison
WLDN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Willdan Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 63.16M and revenue of 155.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.7%.
JBL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Jabil Inc. reported a gross profit of 828.00M and revenue of 8.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.5%.
WLDN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Willdan Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.29M and revenue of 155.11M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.
JBL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Jabil Inc. reported an operating income of 445.00M and revenue of 8.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
WLDN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Willdan Group, Inc. reported a net income of 8.53M and revenue of 155.11M, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.
JBL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Jabil Inc. reported a net income of 275.00M and revenue of 8.75B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WLDN and JBL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JBL has higher volatility (16.74%) compared to WLDN (10.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLDN dropped -89.19% vs JBL's -94.92%.
JBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WLDN and JBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer