WINN vs. IUSG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

WINN (Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF) and IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. WINN is actively managed, while IUSG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WINN returned 23.93%/yr vs 27.59%/yr for IUSG. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. WINN charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSG.

Performance

WINN vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WINN achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 14.08% return.

WINN

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 6.86%
• YTD: 8.60%
• 6M: 7.07%
• 1Y: 22.26%
• 3Y*: 23.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IUSG

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: 7.35%
• YTD: 14.08%
• 6M: 13.91%
• 1Y: 33.89%
• 3Y*: 27.59%
• 5Y*: 15.69%
• 10Y*: 17.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WINN vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	8.60%	14.31%	31.64%	52.44%	-26.67%
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF	14.08%	21.23%	34.70%	29.28%	-20.72%

Correlation

The correlation between WINN and IUSG is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2022	0.96

The correlation between WINN and IUSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

WINN vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WINN	IUSG
Technology	49.2%	48.0%
Communication Services	15.9%	17.1%
Consumer Cyclical	13.3%	9.3%
Healthcare	6.8%	6.2%
Financial Services	5.1%	8.8%
Industrials	4.9%	7.5%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	1.0%
Utilities	1.4%	0.5%
Real Estate	0.4%	0.9%
Basic Materials	-	0.5%
Energy	-	0.2%

Return for Risk

WINN vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WINN

WINN Risk / Return Rank: 33
WINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
WINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
WINN Omega Ratio Rank: 37
WINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
WINN Martin Ratio Rank: 28

IUSG

IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 59
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 60
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WINN vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WINN	IUSG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	2.17	-0.78
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	2.93	-0.99
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.37	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	2.61	-1.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.05	11.09	-7.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WINN vs. IUSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WINN Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the IUSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WINN and IUSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WINN	IUSG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.39	2.17	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.38	+0.25

Drawdowns

WINN vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WINN drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WINN and IUSG.

Drawdown Indicators

	WINN	IUSG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.07%	-63.41%	+31.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.06%	-13.07%	-4.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.66%	-22.28%	-1.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-0.98%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.10%	-21.44%	+12.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.77%	3.06%	+2.71%

Volatility

WINN vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) is 3.71%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that WINN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WINN	IUSG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.71%	4.23%	-0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.19%	12.23%	-0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.09%	15.72%	+0.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.74%	20.87%	+2.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.74%	20.40%	+3.34%

WINN vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WINN has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

WINN vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison

WINN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF	0.47%	0.53%	0.59%	1.12%	1.07%	0.59%	0.93%	1.64%	1.32%	1.28%	1.48%	1.29%
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WINN and IUSG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, WINN and IUSG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, WINN or IUSG?

IUSG has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to WINN (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WINN dropped -32.07% vs IUSG's -63.41%.

Which ETF is better, WINN or IUSG?

On 3-year performance, IUSG leads with 27.59% vs 23.93% for WINN. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, WINN has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WINN or IUSG?

Over the 3-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 27.59% return vs 23.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WINN or IUSG?

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for WINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WINN or IUSG?

IUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for WINN.

What is the main difference between WINN and IUSG?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for WINN and 0.04% for IUSG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IUSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.