WINA vs. BKNG
WINA (Winmark Corporation) and BKNG (Booking Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — WINA in Specialty Retail, BKNG in Travel Services. Over the past 10 years, WINA returned 17.27%/yr vs 13.35%/yr for BKNG. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WINA vs. BKNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WINA achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly higher than BKNG's -20.76% return. Over the past 10 years, WINA has outperformed BKNG with an annualized return of 17.27%, while BKNG has yielded a comparatively lower 13.35% annualized return.
WINA
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- 10.65%
- YTD
- 0.20%
- 6M
- -1.40%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 9.14%
- 5Y*
- 18.79%
- 10Y*
- 17.27%
BKNG
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- -20.76%
- 6M
- -21.98%
- 1Y
- -20.14%
- 3Y*
- 18.02%
- 5Y*
- 13.94%
- 10Y*
- 13.35%
WINA vs. BKNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WINA Winmark Corporation | 0.20% | 6.43% | -3.26% | 82.56% | -2.78% | 38.67% | -5.88% | 25.38% | 23.36% | 2.93% |
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | -20.76% | 8.59% | 41.31% | 76.02% | -16.00% | 7.72% | 8.45% | 19.24% | -0.88% | 18.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between WINA and BKNG is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 1999 | 0.13 |
The correlation between WINA and BKNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WINA:
$1.50B
BKNG:
$134.14B
WINA:
$11.09
BKNG:
$7.60
WINA:
36.42
BKNG:
22.23
WINA:
18.72
BKNG:
0.33
WINA:
17.55
BKNG:
4.94
WINA:
$84.99M
BKNG:
$27.69B
WINA:
$82.15M
BKNG:
$22.16B
WINA:
$55.02M
BKNG:
$9.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WINA vs. BKNG — Risk / Return Rank
WINA
BKNG
WINA vs. BKNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Winmark Corporation (WINA) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WINA | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.91 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | -0.61 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.25 | -1.12 | +1.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WINA vs. BKNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WINA drawdown since its inception was -85.47%, smaller than the maximum BKNG drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WINA and BKNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WINA | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.47% | -99.32% | +13.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.10% | -33.35% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.10% | -33.35% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.29% | -39.53% | +9.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.45% | -47.77% | +2.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.63% | -26.77% | +7.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.68% | -47.03% | +22.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.61% | 17.97% | -2.36% |
Volatility
WINA vs. BKNG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Winmark Corporation (WINA) is 8.41%, while Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) has a volatility of 9.15%. This indicates that WINA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WINA | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.41% | 9.15% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.98% | 27.45% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.64% | 32.48% | +5.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.57% | 32.40% | -0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.99% | 32.32% | -2.33% |
Dividends
WINA vs. BKNG - Dividend Comparison
WINA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than BKNG's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | 0.95% | 0.72% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WINA Winmark Corporation | 3.44% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.99% | 2.35% | 3.67% | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.35% | 0.33% | 0.29% | 0.29% |
Financials
WINA vs. BKNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Winmark Corporation and Booking Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WINA vs. BKNG - Profitability Comparison
WINA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Winmark Corporation reported a gross profit of 20.23M and revenue of 20.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.0%.
BKNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WINA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Winmark Corporation reported an operating income of 12.36M and revenue of 20.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 59.3%.
BKNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.
WINA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Winmark Corporation reported a net income of 9.25M and revenue of 20.85M, resulting in a net margin of 44.4%.
BKNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WINA and BKNG have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKNG has higher volatility (9.15%) compared to WINA (8.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WINA dropped -85.47% vs BKNG's -99.32%.
WINA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WINA and BKNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer