WINA vs. CBRE
WINA (Winmark Corporation) and CBRE (CBRE Group, Inc.) are both stocks. WINA operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while CBRE operates in Real Estate - Services (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, WINA returned 15.14%/yr vs 17.89%/yr for CBRE. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WINA vs. CBRE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WINA achieves a -17.22% return, which is significantly lower than CBRE's -8.69% return. Over the past 10 years, WINA has underperformed CBRE with an annualized return of 15.14%, while CBRE has yielded a comparatively higher 17.89% annualized return.
WINA
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -21.40%
- 6M
- -25.63%
- YTD
- -17.22%
- 1Y
- -7.03%
- 3Y*
- 0.36%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.51%
CBRE
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- 6M
- -13.81%
- YTD
- -8.69%
- 1Y
- -4.63%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.76%
- 10Y*
- 17.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CBRE CBRE Group, Inc. | $292.01M | $255.68M | $301.89M |
| $16.22M | $17.21M | $17.29M |
WINA vs. CBRE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WINA Winmark Corporation | -17.22% | 6.43% | -3.26% | 82.56% | -2.78% | 38.67% | -5.88% | 25.38% | 23.36% | 2.93% |
CBRE CBRE Group, Inc. | -8.69% | 22.47% | 41.04% | 20.96% | -29.08% | 73.01% | 2.33% | 53.07% | -7.55% | 37.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between WINA and CBRE is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2004 | 0.23 |
The correlation between WINA and CBRE shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WINA:
$1.20B
CBRE:
$42.99B
WINA:
$11.00
CBRE:
$5.80
WINA:
30.31
CBRE:
25.31
WINA:
14.27
CBRE:
0.75
WINA:
$86.53M
CBRE:
$43.64B
WINA:
$83.65M
CBRE:
$7.71B
WINA:
$56.03M
CBRE:
$2.71B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WINA vs. CBRE — Risk / Return Rank
WINA
CBRE
WINA vs. CBRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Winmark Corporation (WINA) and CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WINA | CBRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | -0.21 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | -0.42 | -0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WINA vs. CBRE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WINA drawdown since its inception was -85.47%, smaller than the maximum CBRE drawdown of -94.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WINA and CBRE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WINA | CBRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.47% | -94.31% | +8.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.03% | -27.37% | -6.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.03% | -27.37% | -6.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.03% | -40.38% | +6.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.45% | -53.57% | +8.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.60% | -14.45% | -19.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.68% | -26.53% | +1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.45% | 13.71% | +3.74% |
Volatility
WINA vs. CBRE - Volatility Comparison
Winmark Corporation (WINA) and CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) have volatilities of 10.71% and 10.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WINA | CBRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.71% | 10.62% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.28% | 27.39% | +0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.80% | 31.02% | +6.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.81% | 30.41% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.20% | 32.74% | -2.54% |
Dividends
WINA vs. CBRE - Dividend Comparison
WINA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, while CBRE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBRE CBRE Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WINA Winmark Corporation | 4.17% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.99% | 2.35% | 3.67% | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.35% | 0.33% | 0.29% | 0.29% |
Financials
WINA vs. CBRE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Winmark Corporation and CBRE Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WINA vs. CBRE - Profitability Comparison
WINA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Winmark Corporation reported a gross profit of 21.15M and revenue of 21.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.3%.
CBRE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CBRE Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.09B and revenue of 11.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.6%.
WINA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Winmark Corporation reported an operating income of 13.64M and revenue of 21.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 62.1%.
CBRE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CBRE Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 365.00M and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.
WINA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Winmark Corporation reported a net income of 10.37M and revenue of 21.97M, resulting in a net margin of 47.2%.
CBRE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CBRE Group, Inc. reported a net income of 204.00M and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WINA and CBRE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WINA has higher volatility (10.71%) compared to CBRE (10.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WINA dropped -85.47% vs CBRE's -94.31%.
CBRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.19 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WINA and CBRE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer