WINA vs. ENPH
WINA (Winmark Corporation) and ENPH (Enphase Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. WINA operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while ENPH operates in Solar (Technology). Over the past 10 years, WINA returned 15.14%/yr vs 35.57%/yr for ENPH. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WINA vs. ENPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WINA achieves a -17.22% return, which is significantly lower than ENPH's 17.13% return. Over the past 10 years, WINA has underperformed ENPH with an annualized return of 15.14%, while ENPH has yielded a comparatively higher 35.57% annualized return.
WINA
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -21.40%
- 6M
- -25.63%
- YTD
- -17.22%
- 1Y
- -7.03%
- 3Y*
- 0.36%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.51%
ENPH
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -12.84%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 17.13%
- 1Y
- 19.44%
- 3Y*
- -37.03%
- 5Y*
- -27.67%
- 10Y*
- 35.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $194.87M | $189.47M | $367.78M | |
| $16.22M | $17.21M | $17.29M |
WINA vs. ENPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WINA Winmark Corporation | -17.22% | 6.43% | -3.26% | 82.56% | -2.78% | 38.67% | -5.88% | 25.38% | 23.36% | 2.93% |
ENPH Enphase Energy, Inc. | 17.13% | -53.33% | -48.02% | -50.13% | 44.83% | 4.26% | 571.53% | 452.43% | 96.27% | 138.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between WINA and ENPH is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2012 | 0.15 |
The correlation between WINA and ENPH shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WINA:
$1.20B
ENPH:
$4.96B
WINA:
$11.00
ENPH:
$1.01
WINA:
30.31
ENPH:
37.15
WINA:
15.58
ENPH:
0.85
WINA:
14.27
ENPH:
3.75
WINA:
$86.53M
ENPH:
$1.33B
WINA:
$83.65M
ENPH:
$623.68M
WINA:
$56.03M
ENPH:
$203.83M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WINA vs. ENPH — Risk / Return Rank
WINA
ENPH
WINA vs. ENPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Winmark Corporation (WINA) and Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WINA | ENPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.11 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 0.31 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 0.69 | -1.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WINA vs. ENPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WINA drawdown since its inception was -85.47%, smaller than the maximum ENPH drawdown of -95.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WINA and ENPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WINA | ENPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.47% | -95.97% | +10.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.03% | -51.51% | +17.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.03% | -81.34% | +47.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.03% | -92.23% | +58.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.45% | -92.23% | +46.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.60% | -88.83% | +55.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.68% | -50.90% | +26.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.45% | 23.12% | -5.67% |
Volatility
WINA vs. ENPH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Winmark Corporation (WINA) is 10.71%, while Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) has a volatility of 18.66%. This indicates that WINA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WINA | ENPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.71% | 18.66% | -7.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.28% | 68.82% | -40.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.80% | 82.81% | -45.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.81% | 70.68% | -38.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.20% | 78.42% | -48.22% |
Dividends
WINA vs. ENPH - Dividend Comparison
WINA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, while ENPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENPH Enphase Energy, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WINA Winmark Corporation | 4.17% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.99% | 2.35% | 3.67% | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.35% | 0.33% | 0.29% | 0.29% |
Financials
WINA vs. ENPH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Winmark Corporation and Enphase Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WINA vs. ENPH - Profitability Comparison
WINA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Winmark Corporation reported a gross profit of 21.15M and revenue of 21.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.3%.
ENPH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enphase Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 175.01M and revenue of 291.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.0%.
WINA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Winmark Corporation reported an operating income of 13.64M and revenue of 21.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 62.1%.
ENPH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enphase Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 51.52M and revenue of 291.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.
WINA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Winmark Corporation reported a net income of 10.37M and revenue of 21.97M, resulting in a net margin of 47.2%.
ENPH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enphase Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 36.08M and revenue of 291.85M, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WINA and ENPH have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENPH has higher volatility (18.66%) compared to WINA (10.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WINA dropped -85.47% vs ENPH's -95.97%.
ENPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WINA and ENPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer