PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFSPX vs. FASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WFSPX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WFSPX having a 11.54% return and FASGX slightly lower at 11.37%. Over the past 10 years, WFSPX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 15.53%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.96% annualized return.


WFSPX

1D
0.27%
1M
5.23%
YTD
11.54%
6M
11.91%
1Y
29.51%
3Y*
22.66%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
15.53%

FASGX

1D
0.30%
1M
3.62%
YTD
11.37%
6M
12.72%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFSPX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
11.54%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%31.45%-4.83%21.27%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
11.37%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between WFSPX and FASGX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 1993

0.94

The correlation between WFSPX and FASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFSPX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFSPX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WFSPXFASGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.55

2.59

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.46

3.62

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.49

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

3.34

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.81

14.80

+1.00

WFSPX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFSPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFSPX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WFSPXFASGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.59

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.68

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.79

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.63

-0.49

Drawdowns

WFSPX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFSPX drawdown since its inception was -58.21%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFSPX and FASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFSPXFASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.21%

-47.35%

-10.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-7.95%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.74%

-12.80%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

-23.54%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.74%

-27.20%

-6.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.78%

-6.71%

-6.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.79%

+0.11%

Volatility

WFSPX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) is 2.82%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that WFSPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFSPXFASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

3.29%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

8.38%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

10.35%

+1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

12.26%

+4.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

12.65%

+5.37%

WFSPX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFSPX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

WFSPX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

WFSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than FASGX's 6.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.59%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
1.57%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, WFSPX and FASGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FASGX has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to WFSPX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFSPX dropped -58.21% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFSPX and FASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer