PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFSPX vs. APGYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WFSPX vs. APGYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFSPX achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly higher than APGYX's 3.77% return. Over the past 10 years, WFSPX has underperformed APGYX with an annualized return of 15.46%, while APGYX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.60% annualized return.


WFSPX

1D
1.09%
1M
0.46%
YTD
10.17%
6M
9.66%
1Y
27.12%
3Y*
20.94%
5Y*
14.06%
10Y*
15.46%

APGYX

1D
1.75%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
3.77%
6M
3.65%
1Y
15.50%
3Y*
18.05%
5Y*
10.39%
10Y*
16.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFSPX vs. APGYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
10.17%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%31.45%-4.83%21.27%
APGYX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class
3.77%13.25%25.40%35.01%-28.78%28.92%34.38%34.13%2.22%31.68%

Correlation

The correlation between WFSPX and APGYX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 1996

0.93

The correlation between WFSPX and APGYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFSPX vs. APGYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

APGYX
APGYX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
APGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
APGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
APGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
APGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFSPX vs. APGYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WFSPXAPGYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.18

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

0.96

+2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.70

3.50

+10.20

WFSPX vs. APGYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFSPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the APGYX Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFSPX and APGYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WFSPX vs. APGYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFSPX drawdown since its inception was -58.21%, smaller than the maximum APGYX drawdown of -66.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFSPX and APGYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFSPXAPGYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.21%

-66.33%

+8.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-15.24%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.74%

-21.59%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

-33.91%

+9.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.74%

-33.91%

+0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-2.44%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.76%

-20.97%

+8.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

4.15%

-2.19%

Volatility

WFSPX vs. APGYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX) is 4.77%, while AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that WFSPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APGYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFSPXAPGYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

5.41%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

11.83%

-1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.46%

14.98%

-2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

20.25%

-3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

19.72%

-1.65%

WFSPX vs. APGYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFSPX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than APGYX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

WFSPX vs. APGYX - Dividend Comparison

WFSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than APGYX's 9.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APGYX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class
9.40%9.76%6.58%1.65%0.86%7.17%2.59%3.43%9.08%3.77%2.67%8.57%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
1.59%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, WFSPX and APGYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

APGYX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to WFSPX (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFSPX dropped -58.21% vs APGYX's -66.33%.

WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFSPX and APGYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer