PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFIOX vs. EKWAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WFIOX vs. EKWAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Index Fund (WFIOX) and Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFIOX achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than EKWAX's -1.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WFIOX having a 15.33% annualized return and EKWAX not far behind at 14.60%.


WFIOX

1D
-0.73%
1M
4.16%
YTD
10.77%
6M
10.65%
1Y
27.70%
3Y*
22.14%
5Y*
13.63%
10Y*
15.33%

EKWAX

1D
-3.37%
1M
-1.21%
YTD
-1.01%
6M
6.25%
1Y
61.84%
3Y*
45.31%
5Y*
22.47%
10Y*
14.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFIOX vs. EKWAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WFIOX
Allspring Index Fund
10.77%17.57%24.66%26.01%-18.30%28.34%17.74%31.55%-4.49%21.59%
EKWAX
Allspring Precious Metals Fund
-1.01%163.65%21.28%8.83%-7.75%-11.00%24.40%40.35%-12.83%9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between WFIOX and EKWAX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 1998

0.20

The correlation between WFIOX and EKWAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFIOX vs. EKWAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFIOX
WFIOX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
WFIOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFIOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFIOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WFIOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFIOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

EKWAX
EKWAX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EKWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EKWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
EKWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
EKWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
EKWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFIOX vs. EKWAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Index Fund (WFIOX) and Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WFIOXEKWAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.26

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

2.15

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.55

5.52

+9.03

WFIOX vs. EKWAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFIOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the EKWAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFIOX and EKWAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WFIOXEKWAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

1.43

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.67

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.44

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.32

+0.18

Drawdowns

WFIOX vs. EKWAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFIOX drawdown since its inception was -54.40%, smaller than the maximum EKWAX drawdown of -76.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFIOX and EKWAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFIOXEKWAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.40%

-76.76%

+22.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-29.03%

+20.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

-29.03%

+10.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.63%

-42.79%

+18.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.94%

-49.23%

+15.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-26.39%

+25.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.67%

-32.77%

+23.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

11.29%

-9.38%

Volatility

WFIOX vs. EKWAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Index Fund (WFIOX) is 2.92%, while Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) has a volatility of 15.29%. This indicates that WFIOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EKWAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFIOXEKWAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

15.29%

-12.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

35.84%

-26.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

43.51%

-31.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

33.49%

-16.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.14%

33.08%

-14.94%

WFIOX vs. EKWAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFIOX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EKWAX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

WFIOX vs. EKWAX - Dividend Comparison

WFIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.36%, more than EKWAX's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EKWAX
Allspring Precious Metals Fund
1.21%1.19%0.84%0.00%2.01%1.35%1.45%0.11%0.00%1.34%1.11%0.00%
WFIOX
Allspring Index Fund
6.36%7.04%8.54%7.63%10.41%9.15%14.40%33.14%33.69%20.04%10.07%8.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


WFIOX and EKWAX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EKWAX has higher volatility (15.29%) compared to WFIOX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFIOX dropped -54.40% vs EKWAX's -76.76%.

WFIOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFIOX and EKWAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer