WFIG vs. DGRW
WFIG (WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund) and DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WFIG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the WisdomTree Fundamental Corporate Bond Index, while DGRW is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WFIG returned 2.47%/yr vs 13.95%/yr for DGRW. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WFIG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DGRW.
Performance
WFIG vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFIG achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 7.74% return. Over the past 10 years, WFIG has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 2.47%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 13.95% annualized return.
WFIG
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- 5.27%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- 0.50%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
DGRW
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 7.74%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- 19.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.35%
- 5Y*
- 11.89%
- 10Y*
- 13.95%
WFIG vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFIG WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund | 0.19% | 7.85% | 2.28% | 8.48% | -16.25% | -1.52% | 9.75% | 13.97% | -2.01% | 7.00% |
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 7.74% | 12.17% | 16.98% | 18.66% | -6.33% | 24.46% | 13.87% | 29.54% | -5.38% | 26.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between WFIG and DGRW is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2016 | 0.20 |
Over the past year, WFIG and DGRW have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WFIG vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank
WFIG
DGRW
WFIG vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (WFIG) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WFIG | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 2.39 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.12 | 10.45 | -4.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WFIG | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.97 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.85 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.86 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.85 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
WFIG vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFIG drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, smaller than the maximum DGRW drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFIG and DGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFIG | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.92% | -32.04% | +9.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.69% | -8.30% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.22% | -16.21% | +9.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | -17.27% | -5.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.92% | -32.04% | +9.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -2.06% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -3.01% | -2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 1.89% | -1.03% |
Volatility
WFIG vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (WFIG) is 1.34%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that WFIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WFIG | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 3.05% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.08% | 7.92% | -4.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.15% | 10.09% | -5.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.13% | 13.99% | -6.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.54% | 16.22% | -8.68% |
WFIG vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
WFIG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
WFIG vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison
WFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than DGRW's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.93% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 2.18% |
WFIG WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund | 4.89% | 4.82% | 4.67% | 4.19% | 4.25% | 2.50% | 2.61% | 3.00% | 3.27% | 2.88% | 2.35% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WFIG and DGRW have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGRW has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to WFIG (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFIG dropped -22.92% vs DGRW's -32.04%.
On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 13.95% vs 2.47% for WFIG. On fees, WFIG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, WFIG has been the lower-risk option at 1.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 13.95% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WFIG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DGRW.
WFIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 1.28% for DGRW.
WFIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while DGRW is Dividend. WFIG tracks WisdomTree Fundamental Corporate Bond Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WFIG and 0.28% for DGRW.
DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WFIG and DGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer