PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFIG vs. USFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WFIG vs. USFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (WFIG) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFIG achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 2.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WFIG having a 2.39% annualized return and USFR not far ahead at 2.49%.


WFIG

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.62%
6M
-0.08%
YTD
0.11%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
2.39%

USFR

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
6M
1.90%
YTD
2.01%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*
2.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFIG vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WFIG
WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund
0.11%7.85%2.28%8.48%-16.25%-1.52%9.75%13.97%-2.01%7.00%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
2.01%4.23%5.47%5.18%1.98%-0.03%0.56%2.02%2.01%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between WFIG and USFR is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2016

0.02

The correlation between WFIG and USFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFIG vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFIG
WFIG Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
WFIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFIG Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
WFIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFIG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

USFR
USFR Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
USFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFR Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
USFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFR Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFIG vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (WFIG) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WFIGUSFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-13.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-50.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

14.08

-12.92

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

200.62

-199.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.38

801.27

-796.89

WFIG vs. USFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFIG Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the USFR Sharpe Ratio of 14.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFIG and USFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WFIG vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFIG drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFIG and USFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFIGUSFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.92%

-1.36%

-21.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.69%

-0.02%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.22%

-0.06%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.92%

-0.18%

-22.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.92%

-0.80%

-22.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

0.00%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.47%

-0.15%

-5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.00%

+0.88%

Volatility

WFIG vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (WFIG) has a higher volatility of 1.21% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.07%. This indicates that WFIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFIGUSFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

0.07%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

0.19%

+3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

0.27%

+3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.11%

0.39%

+6.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.55%

0.77%

+6.78%

WFIG vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFIG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

WFIG vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison

WFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than USFR's 3.84% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
3.84%4.15%5.17%5.12%1.78%0.01%0.40%2.08%1.67%1.03%0.29%
WFIG
WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund
4.93%4.82%4.67%4.19%4.25%2.50%2.61%3.00%3.27%2.88%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


WFIG and USFR have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WFIG has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to USFR (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFIG dropped -22.92% vs USFR's -1.36%.

On 10-year performance, USFR leads with 2.49% vs 2.39% for WFIG. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USFR has performed better with a 2.49% return vs 2.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WFIG.

WFIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 3.84% for USFR.

WFIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while USFR is Government Bonds. WFIG tracks WisdomTree Fundamental Corporate Bond Index, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WFIG and 0.15% for USFR.

USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.83 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFIG and USFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer