WFIG vs. GDMN

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

WFIG (WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WFIG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the WisdomTree Fundamental Corporate Bond Index, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. WFIG is passively managed, while GDMN is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, WFIG returned 5.24%/yr vs 59.00%/yr for GDMN. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WFIG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.

Performance

WFIG vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (WFIG) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFIG achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -13.26% return.

WFIG

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 0.60%
• 6M: 0.79%
• 1Y: 5.14%
• 3Y*: 5.24%
• 5Y*: 0.31%
• 10Y*: 2.43%

GDMN

• 1D: -2.19%
• 1M: -10.92%
• YTD: -13.26%
• 6M: -19.52%
• 1Y: 61.98%
• 3Y*: 59.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFIG vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WFIG WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund	0.60%	7.85%	2.28%	8.48%	-16.25%	-0.12%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	-13.26%	237.09%	28.23%	12.97%	-14.62%	6.93%

Correlation

The correlation between WFIG and GDMN is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021	0.31

Return for Risk

WFIG vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFIG

WFIG Risk / Return Rank: 37
WFIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
WFIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
WFIG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
WFIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
WFIG Martin Ratio Rank: 39

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 28
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 31
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFIG vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (WFIG) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WFIG	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	0.98	+0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	1.45	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.21	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	1.28	+0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.88	3.31	+2.57

WFIG vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFIG and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WFIG vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFIG drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFIG and GDMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	WFIG	GDMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.92%	-52.82%	+29.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.69%	-48.76%	+46.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.22%	-48.76%	+42.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.19%	-43.06%	+41.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.49%	-19.11%	+13.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	18.77%	-17.89%

Volatility

WFIG vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (WFIG) is 1.10%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 21.69%. This indicates that WFIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WFIG	GDMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.10%	21.69%	-20.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.14%	54.94%	-51.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.13%	63.98%	-59.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.12%	48.18%	-41.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.55%	48.18%	-40.63%

WFIG vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFIG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

WFIG vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

WFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than GDMN's 3.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	3.11%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WFIG WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund	4.87%	4.82%	4.67%	4.19%	4.25%	2.50%	2.61%	3.00%	3.27%	2.88%	2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WFIG and GDMN in my portfolio?

WFIG and GDMN have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WFIG or GDMN?

GDMN has higher volatility (21.69%) compared to WFIG (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFIG dropped -22.92% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

Which ETF is better, WFIG or GDMN?

On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 59.00% vs 5.24% for WFIG. On fees, WFIG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, WFIG has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WFIG or GDMN?

Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 59.00% return vs 5.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WFIG or GDMN?

WFIG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WFIG or GDMN?

WFIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.87%, compared with 3.11% for GDMN.

What is the main difference between WFIG and GDMN?

WFIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WFIG and 0.45% for GDMN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WFIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.