WFH vs. ARMH
WFH (Direxion Work From Home ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. WFH is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. WFH charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.
Performance
WFH vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WFH
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMH
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WFH vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WFH Direxion Work From Home ETF | 0.00% |
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 23.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WFH vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WFH | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 471,500.14 | — |
Drawdowns
WFH vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFH | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.40% | — |
Volatility
WFH vs. ARMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WFH | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 113.00% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 113.00% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 113.00% | — |
WFH vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
WFH has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
WFH vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison
WFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WFH Direxion Work From Home ETF | 0.91% | 0.94% | 0.50% | 0.67% | 0.42% | 0.79% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WFH.
WFH has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WFH and 0.19% for ARMH.
Find the right allocation for WFH and ARMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer