PortfoliosLab logo
WFH vs. ITB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between WFH and ITB is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

WFH vs. ITB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
18.14%
122.91%
WFH
ITB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WFH:

0.40

ITB:

-0.34

Sortino Ratio

WFH:

0.74

ITB:

-0.32

Omega Ratio

WFH:

1.10

ITB:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

WFH:

0.30

ITB:

-0.29

Martin Ratio

WFH:

1.33

ITB:

-0.68

Ulcer Index

WFH:

7.98%

ITB:

14.45%

Daily Std Dev

WFH:

26.63%

ITB:

28.34%

Max Drawdown

WFH:

-51.23%

ITB:

-86.53%

Current Drawdown

WFH:

-25.85%

ITB:

-28.19%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WFH having a -9.82% return and ITB slightly lower at -10.26%.


WFH

YTD

-9.82%

1M

-6.48%

6M

-2.87%

1Y

8.53%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ITB

YTD

-10.26%

1M

-5.12%

6M

-23.63%

1Y

-11.16%

5Y*

24.24%

10Y*

13.90%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WFH vs. ITB - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFH has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ITB's 0.42% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for WFH: current value is 0.45%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
WFH: 0.45%
Expense ratio chart for ITB: current value is 0.42%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
ITB: 0.42%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

WFH vs. ITB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WFH is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WFH is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WFH is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WFH is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WFH is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WFH is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

ITB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ITB is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ITB is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ITB is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ITB is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ITB is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ITB is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WFH vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for WFH, currently valued at 0.40, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
WFH: 0.40
ITB: -0.34
The chart of Sortino ratio for WFH, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
WFH: 0.74
ITB: -0.32
The chart of Omega ratio for WFH, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
WFH: 1.10
ITB: 0.96
The chart of Calmar ratio for WFH, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
WFH: 0.30
ITB: -0.29
The chart of Martin ratio for WFH, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
WFH: 1.33
ITB: -0.68

The current WFH Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the ITB Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFH and ITB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.40
-0.34
WFH
ITB

Dividends

WFH vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison

WFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than ITB's 1.07% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WFH
Direxion Work From Home ETF
0.54%0.50%0.67%0.42%0.79%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
1.07%0.46%0.48%0.86%0.37%0.46%0.50%0.63%0.28%0.43%0.34%0.34%

Drawdowns

WFH vs. ITB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFH drawdown since its inception was -51.23%, smaller than the maximum ITB drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFH and ITB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-25.85%
-28.19%
WFH
ITB

Volatility

WFH vs. ITB - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) has a higher volatility of 18.12% compared to iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) at 12.98%. This indicates that WFH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
18.12%
12.98%
WFH
ITB