WFH vs. ITB
WFH (Direxion Work From Home ETF) and ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WFH is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Remote Work Index, while ITB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WFH charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for ITB.
Performance
WFH vs. ITB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WFH
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITB
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- -3.80%
- 6M
- -12.12%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
WFH vs. ITB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFH Direxion Work From Home ETF | 0.00% | 15.47% | 18.55% | 35.75% | -45.26% | 10.77% | 34.26% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | -3.80% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 30.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between WFH and ITB is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WFH and ITB has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
WFH vs. ITB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WFH
ITB
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
WFH
ITB
-
Communication Services
WFH
ITB
-
Consumer Cyclical
WFH
ITB
Industrials
WFH
ITB
Basic Materials
WFH
-
ITB
Consumer Defensive
WFH
-
ITB
-
Energy
WFH
-
ITB
-
Financial Services
WFH
-
ITB
-
Healthcare
WFH
-
ITB
-
Real Estate
WFH
-
ITB
Utilities
WFH
-
ITB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WFH vs. ITB — Risk / Return Rank
WFH
ITB
WFH vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WFH | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.11 | — |
Drawdowns
WFH vs. ITB - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFH | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -86.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -27.07% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -37.10% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.09% | — |
Volatility
WFH vs. ITB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WFH | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 29.47% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 29.19% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 30.00% | — |
WFH vs. ITB - Expense Ratio Comparison
WFH has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ITB's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
WFH vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison
WFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than ITB's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 1.23% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
WFH Direxion Work From Home ETF | 0.91% | 0.94% | 0.50% | 0.67% | 0.42% | 0.79% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WFH and ITB have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITB is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WFH.
ITB has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.91% for WFH.
WFH is categorized as Technology Equities, while ITB is Building & Construction. WFH tracks Solactive Remote Work Index, while ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WFH and 0.42% for ITB.
Find the right allocation for WFH and ITB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer