WFH vs. ITB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB).

WFH and ITB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WFH is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Solactive Remote Work Index. It was launched on Jun 25, 2020. ITB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. It was launched on May 1, 2006. Both WFH and ITB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

WFH vs. ITB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WFH vs. ITB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
WFH Direxion Work From Home ETF	0.00%	15.47%	18.55%	35.75%	-45.26%	10.77%	34.26%
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF	-5.79%	-5.26%	2.06%	68.91%	-26.26%	49.25%	30.92%

Returns By Period

WFH

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ITB

• 1D: 2.80%
• 1M: -15.62%
• YTD: -5.79%
• 6M: -15.27%
• 1Y: -3.74%
• 3Y*: 9.80%
• 5Y*: 6.35%
• 10Y*: 13.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFH vs. ITB - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFH has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ITB's 0.42% expense ratio.

WFH

Direxion Work From Home ETF

ITB

iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF

Return for Risk

WFH vs. ITB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITB

ITB Risk / Return Rank: 10
ITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
ITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
ITB Omega Ratio Rank: 10
ITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
ITB Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFH vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WFH	ITB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.11	—

Correlation

The correlation between WFH and ITB is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

WFH vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison

WFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than ITB's 1.25% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WFH Direxion Work From Home ETF	0.91%	0.94%	0.50%	0.67%	0.42%	0.79%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF	1.25%	1.67%	0.46%	0.48%	0.86%	0.37%	0.46%	0.50%	0.63%	0.28%	0.43%	0.34%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	WFH	ITB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-86.53%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-24.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.55%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-52.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-28.58%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-37.20%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.43%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WFH	ITB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.95%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.21%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	30.44%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	29.08%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	29.81%	—