WFDDX vs. EKBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Discovery SMID Cap Growth Fund (WFDDX) and Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX).
WFDDX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Apr 8, 2005. EKBAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 19, 1998.
Performance
WFDDX vs. EKBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WFDDX vs. EKBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFDDX Allspring Discovery SMID Cap Growth Fund | -5.44% | 5.51% | 18.05% | 20.25% | -37.83% | -6.10% | 61.81% | 61.34% | -6.95% | 29.27% |
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 7.46% | 21.87% | 21.75% | 22.23% | -13.47% | 19.61% | 12.66% | 32.99% | -5.55% | 14.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFDDX achieves a -5.44% return, which is significantly lower than EKBAX's 7.46% return. Over the past 10 years, WFDDX has underperformed EKBAX with an annualized return of 11.17%, while EKBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.11% annualized return.
WFDDX
- 1D
- 5.02%
- 1M
- -7.37%
- YTD
- -5.44%
- 6M
- -5.97%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- 8.43%
- 5Y*
- -3.02%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
EKBAX
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 13.50%
- 1Y
- 39.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.93%
- 5Y*
- 14.35%
- 10Y*
- 14.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WFDDX vs. EKBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WFDDX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than EKBAX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WFDDX vs. EKBAX — Risk / Return Rank
WFDDX
EKBAX
WFDDX vs. EKBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Discovery SMID Cap Growth Fund (WFDDX) and Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WFDDX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 1.96 | -1.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.85 | 2.56 | -1.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.41 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 3.08 | -2.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.63 | 15.01 | -12.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WFDDX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 1.96 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.81 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.81 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.47 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between WFDDX and EKBAX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WFDDX vs. EKBAX - Dividend Comparison
WFDDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.16%, more than EKBAX's 8.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFDDX Allspring Discovery SMID Cap Growth Fund | 18.16% | 17.17% | 9.33% | 0.00% | 1.35% | 36.45% | 4.93% | 26.87% | 19.12% | 17.95% | 1.32% | 8.92% |
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 8.95% | 9.61% | 5.28% | 6.16% | 12.50% | 6.89% | 2.03% | 9.49% | 7.14% | 6.20% | 10.05% | 11.47% |
Drawdowns
WFDDX vs. EKBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFDDX drawdown since its inception was -59.22%, which is greater than EKBAX's maximum drawdown of -55.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFDDX and EKBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFDDX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.22% | -55.64% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.77% | -13.29% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.22% | -24.84% | -34.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.22% | -32.33% | -26.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.02% | -4.75% | -32.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.17% | -8.03% | -8.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 2.72% | +1.48% |
Volatility
WFDDX vs. EKBAX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Discovery SMID Cap Growth Fund (WFDDX) has a higher volatility of 10.27% compared to Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) at 6.47%. This indicates that WFDDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EKBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WFDDX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.27% | 6.47% | +3.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.20% | 13.05% | +3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.09% | 20.88% | +4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.39% | 17.89% | +15.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.15% | 17.42% | +11.73% |