WFDDX vs. VOO

In the year-to-date period, WFDDX achieves a -2.38% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, WFDDX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 7.84%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.81% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WFDDX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Discovery SMID Cap Growth Fund (WFDDX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WFDDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFDDX and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

WFDDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.55%, more than VOO's 1.29% yield.

The maximum WFDDX drawdown since its inception was -56.27%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFDDX and VOO.

Allspring Discovery SMID Cap Growth Fund (WFDDX) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.83%. This indicates that WFDDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.