WFDDX vs. OPOCX

In the year-to-date period, WFDDX achieves a -13.56% return, which is significantly higher than OPOCX's -15.44% return. Over the past 10 years, WFDDX has underperformed OPOCX with an annualized return of -3.74%, while OPOCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.80% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WFDDX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than OPOCX's 1.01% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Discovery SMID Cap Growth Fund (WFDDX) and Invesco Discovery Fund (OPOCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WFDDX Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the OPOCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFDDX and OPOCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

WFDDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OPOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.11%.

The maximum WFDDX drawdown since its inception was -64.36%, which is greater than OPOCX's maximum drawdown of -51.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFDDX and OPOCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Allspring Discovery SMID Cap Growth Fund (WFDDX) and Invesco Discovery Fund (OPOCX) have volatilities of 15.66% and 15.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.