WFC vs. SHW
WFC (Wells Fargo & Company) and SHW (The Sherwin-Williams Company) are both stocks. WFC operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while SHW operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, WFC returned 8.95%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for SHW. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WFC vs. SHW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFC achieves a -9.20% return, which is significantly lower than SHW's -1.61% return. Over the past 10 years, WFC has underperformed SHW with an annualized return of 8.95%, while SHW has yielded a comparatively higher 13.58% annualized return.
WFC
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- 14.04%
- YTD
- -9.20%
- 6M
- -8.77%
- 1Y
- 18.25%
- 3Y*
- 28.38%
- 5Y*
- 15.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.95%
SHW
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- -1.61%
- 6M
- -3.00%
- 1Y
- -4.65%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
WFC vs. SHW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | -9.20% | 35.57% | 46.48% | 22.94% | -11.92% | 61.15% | -41.65% | 21.44% | -21.83% | 13.21% |
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | -1.61% | -3.83% | 9.90% | 32.73% | -31.96% | 44.90% | 27.05% | 49.70% | -3.23% | 54.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between WFC and SHW is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.33 |
Fundamentals
WFC:
$269.39B
SHW:
$78.72B
WFC:
$6.73
SHW:
$10.42
WFC:
12.44
SHW:
30.45
WFC:
1.07
SHW:
2.96
WFC:
2.15
SHW:
3.31
WFC:
1.65
SHW:
17.77
WFC:
$125.70B
SHW:
$23.94B
WFC:
$81.14B
SHW:
$11.76B
WFC:
$31.58B
SHW:
$4.29B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WFC vs. SHW — Risk / Return Rank
WFC
SHW
WFC vs. SHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WFC | SHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.95 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | -0.47 | +1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.54 | -0.99 | +2.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WFC vs. SHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFC drawdown since its inception was -79.01%, which is greater than SHW's maximum drawdown of -52.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFC and SHW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFC | SHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.01% | -52.02% | -26.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.02% | -21.36% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.73% | -25.69% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.10% | -42.46% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.46% | -42.46% | -22.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.21% | -19.53% | +7.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.35% | -11.63% | -3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.18% | 10.28% | -0.10% |
Volatility
WFC vs. SHW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is 5.95%, while The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that WFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WFC | SHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 9.00% | -3.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.95% | 19.26% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.75% | 25.46% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.23% | 26.27% | +3.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.28% | 26.58% | +5.70% |
Dividends
WFC vs. SHW - Dividend Comparison
WFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than SHW's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | 1.00% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 1.25% | 1.03% |
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 2.15% | 1.82% | 2.14% | 2.64% | 2.66% | 1.25% | 4.04% | 3.57% | 3.56% | 2.54% | 2.75% | 2.71% |
Financials
WFC vs. SHW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wells Fargo & Company and The Sherwin-Williams Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WFC vs. SHW - Profitability Comparison
WFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a gross profit of 20.31B and revenue of 31.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.9%.
SHW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a gross profit of 2.78B and revenue of 5.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.
WFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported an operating income of 5.85B and revenue of 31.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.
SHW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported an operating income of 810.90M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.
WFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a net income of 5.29B and revenue of 31.80B, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.
SHW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a net income of 534.70M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WFC and SHW have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHW has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to WFC (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFC dropped -79.01% vs SHW's -52.02%.
WFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WFC and SHW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer