WFC vs. BAC

In the year-to-date period, WFC achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's -9.12% return. Over the past 10 years, WFC has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of 5.30%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.90% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WFC Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFC and BAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

WFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than BAC's 2.57% yield.

The maximum WFC drawdown since its inception was -79.01%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFC and BAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is 16.63%, while Bank of America Corporation (BAC) has a volatility of 18.10%. This indicates that WFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wells Fargo & Company and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.