WFC vs. BAC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC).

Performance

WFC vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WFC vs. BAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WFC Wells Fargo & Company	-14.16%	35.57%	46.48%	22.94%	-11.92%	61.15%	-41.65%	21.44%	-21.83%	13.21%
BAC Bank of America Corporation	-10.86%	28.04%	33.85%	4.83%	-23.82%	49.61%	-11.63%	46.19%	-15.00%	35.69%

Fundamentals

Market Cap WFC : $256.14B BAC : $367.91B
EPS WFC : $6.60 BAC : $4.03
PE Ratio WFC : 12.07 BAC : 12.11
PEG Ratio WFC : 1.04 BAC : 0.59
PS Ratio WFC : 2.27 BAC : 1.97
PB Ratio WFC : 1.56 BAC : 1.33
Total Revenue (TTM) WFC : $113.26B BAC : $188.75B
Gross Profit (TTM) WFC : $81.08B BAC : $104.61B
EBITDA (TTM) WFC : $29.35B BAC : $36.61B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFC achieves a -14.16% return, which is significantly lower than BAC's -10.86% return. Over the past 10 years, WFC has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of 8.07%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.19% annualized return.

WFC

• 1D: 3.66%
• 1M: -2.26%
• YTD: -14.16%
• 6M: -4.05%
• 1Y: 13.30%
• 3Y*: 32.00%
• 5Y*: 17.69%
• 10Y*: 8.07%

BAC

• 1D: 3.22%
• 1M: -1.61%
• YTD: -10.86%
• 6M: -4.48%
• 1Y: 19.45%
• 3Y*: 22.60%
• 5Y*: 6.87%
• 10Y*: 16.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WFC vs. BAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFC

WFC Risk / Return Rank: 56
WFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
WFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
WFC Omega Ratio Rank: 51
WFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
WFC Martin Ratio Rank: 62

BAC

BAC Risk / Return Rank: 65
BAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BAC Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
BAC Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFC vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WFC	BAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	0.73	-0.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	1.06	-0.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.16	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	1.16	-0.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.07	3.17	-1.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WFC vs. BAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFC Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFC and BAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WFC	BAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45	0.73	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.26	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25	0.53	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.20	+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between WFC and BAC is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

WFC vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison

WFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than BAC's 2.26% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WFC Wells Fargo & Company	2.20%	1.82%	2.14%	2.64%	2.66%	1.25%	4.04%	3.57%	3.56%	2.54%	2.75%	2.71%
BAC Bank of America Corporation	2.26%	1.96%	2.28%	2.73%	2.60%	1.75%	2.38%	1.87%	2.19%	1.32%	1.13%	1.19%

Drawdowns

WFC vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFC drawdown since its inception was -79.01%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFC and BAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	WFC	BAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.01%	-93.10%	+14.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.75%	-17.93%	-4.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.10%	-46.64%	+9.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.46%	-48.95%	-15.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.00%	-14.37%	-2.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.34%	-28.40%	+13.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.28%	6.57%	+0.71%

Volatility

WFC vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 6.67%. This indicates that WFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WFC	BAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.89%	6.67%	+1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.89%	16.72%	+3.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.40%	26.82%	+2.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.17%	26.84%	+3.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.16%	30.80%	+1.36%

Financials

WFC vs. BAC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Wells Fargo & Company and Bank of America Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a gross profit of 21.29B and revenue of 21.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

BAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a gross profit of 27.06B and revenue of 46.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.7%.

WFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported an operating income of 6.53B and revenue of 21.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.7%.

BAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported an operating income of 9.62B and revenue of 46.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

WFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a net income of 5.36B and revenue of 21.29B, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.

BAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a net income of 7.65B and revenue of 46.88B, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.