WFC vs. IFF
WFC (Wells Fargo & Company) and IFF (International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.) are both stocks. WFC operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while IFF operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, WFC returned 9.11%/yr vs -3.65%/yr for IFF. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WFC vs. IFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFC achieves a -6.25% return, which is significantly lower than IFF's 18.87% return. Over the past 10 years, WFC has outperformed IFF with an annualized return of 9.11%, while IFF has yielded a comparatively lower -3.65% annualized return.
WFC
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- -3.45%
- YTD
- -6.25%
- 1Y
- 13.59%
- 3Y*
- 26.79%
- 5Y*
- 16.24%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.08%
IFF
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- 6M
- 14.75%
- YTD
- 18.87%
- 1Y
- 16.78%
- 3Y*
- 0.37%
- 5Y*
- -9.67%
- 10Y*
- -3.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $133.86M | $143.38M | $158.00M | |
| $1.25B | $1.40B | $1.35B |
WFC vs. IFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | -6.25% | 35.57% | 46.48% | 22.94% | -11.92% | 61.15% | -41.65% | 21.44% | -21.83% | 13.21% |
IFF International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. | 18.87% | -18.43% | 6.26% | -19.47% | -28.35% | 41.55% | -15.64% | -3.91% | -12.02% | 29.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between WFC and IFF is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1981 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WFC and IFF has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
WFC:
$264.55B
IFF:
$20.23B
WFC:
$7.11
IFF:
$4.90
WFC:
12.15
IFF:
16.18
WFC:
2.13
IFF:
1.26
WFC:
$129.11B
IFF:
$10.79B
WFC:
$83.28B
IFF:
$3.79B
WFC:
$33.13B
IFF:
$1.77B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WFC vs. IFF — Risk / Return Rank
WFC
IFF
WFC vs. IFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WFC | IFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.11 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 0.74 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | 1.59 | -0.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WFC vs. IFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFC drawdown since its inception was -79.01%, smaller than the maximum IFF drawdown of -87.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFC and IFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFC | IFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.01% | -87.25% | +8.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.02% | -19.26% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.73% | -42.63% | +17.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.10% | -57.42% | +20.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.46% | -57.42% | -7.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.36% | -42.21% | +32.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.33% | -37.30% | +21.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.67% | 9.15% | +1.52% |
Volatility
WFC vs. IFF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is 7.40%, while International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) has a volatility of 10.08%. This indicates that WFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WFC | IFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.40% | 10.08% | -2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.23% | 29.16% | -8.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.74% | 35.11% | -8.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.93% | 32.13% | -2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.32% | 30.56% | +1.76% |
Dividends
WFC vs. IFF - Dividend Comparison
WFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than IFF's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFF International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. | 2.02% | 2.37% | 1.89% | 4.00% | 3.05% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 2.08% | 1.82% | 2.14% | 2.64% | 2.66% | 1.25% | 4.04% | 3.57% | 3.56% | 2.54% | 2.75% | 2.71% |
Financials
WFC vs. IFF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wells Fargo & Company and International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WFC vs. IFF - Profitability Comparison
WFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a gross profit of 21.71B and revenue of 33.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.6%.
IFF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.02B and revenue of 2.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.
WFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported an operating income of 8.05B and revenue of 33.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.
IFF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. reported an operating income of 273.00M and revenue of 2.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
WFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a net income of 6.41B and revenue of 33.59B, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.
IFF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. reported a net income of 169.00M and revenue of 2.74B, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WFC and IFF have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IFF has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to WFC (7.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFC dropped -79.01% vs IFF's -87.25%.
IFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WFC and IFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer