WEEL vs. RYLD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

WEEL (Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF) and RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. WEEL is actively managed, while RYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, WEEL returned 16.25% vs 24.93% for RYLD. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. WEEL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RYLD.

Performance

WEEL vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF (WEEL) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEEL achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 12.29% return.

WEEL

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 1.29%
• 6M: 5.52%
• YTD: 6.19%
• 1Y: 16.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.19%

RYLD

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 1.19%
• 6M: 10.16%
• YTD: 12.29%
• 1Y: 24.93%
• 3Y*: 8.04%
• 5Y*: 3.15%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	$10.07M	$9.36M	$9.08M
WEEL Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF	$406.88K	$319.91K	$357.06K

WEEL vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WEEL Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF	6.19%	17.73%	3.10%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	12.29%	5.65%	7.07%

Correlation

The correlation between WEEL and RYLD is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2024	0.74

The correlation between WEEL and RYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

WEEL vs. RYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WEEL	RYLD
Technology	27.1%	14.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	9.2%
Utilities	11.1%	2.8%
Basic Materials	10.9%	4.4%
Energy	9.9%	5.5%
Communication Services	9.9%	2.2%
Healthcare	7.7%	20.3%
Financial Services	4.8%	17.8%
Industrials	3.7%	14.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	2.6%
Real Estate	0.6%	6.8%

Return for Risk

WEEL vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WEEL

WEEL Risk / Return Rank: 84
WEEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
WEEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
WEEL Omega Ratio Rank: 82
WEEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
WEEL Martin Ratio Rank: 91

RYLD

RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 90
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WEEL vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF (WEEL) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WEEL	RYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	2.17	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	3.05	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.45	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	3.67	-0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.04	15.02	+0.01

WEEL vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEEL Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEEL and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WEEL vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEEL drawdown since its inception was -17.45%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEEL and RYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	WEEL	RYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.45%	-41.53%	+24.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.60%	-6.29%	+1.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-0.37%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.41%	-8.65%	+7.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	1.54%	-0.52%

Volatility

WEEL vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF (WEEL) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 2.07%. This indicates that WEEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WEEL	RYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	2.07%	+0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.93%	7.73%	-0.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.59%	10.67%	-2.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.65%	13.97%	-1.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.65%	17.04%	-4.39%

WEEL vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEEL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

WEEL vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

WEEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.72%, more than RYLD's 11.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	11.62%	12.00%	12.03%	12.64%	13.49%	12.35%	10.76%	6.43%
WEEL Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF	12.72%	12.72%	6.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WEEL and RYLD in my portfolio?

WEEL and RYLD have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WEEL or RYLD?

WEEL has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to RYLD (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEEL dropped -17.45% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

Which ETF is better, WEEL or RYLD?

On 1-year performance, RYLD leads with 24.93% vs 16.25% for WEEL. On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WEEL or RYLD?

Over the 1-year period, RYLD has performed better with a 24.93% return vs 16.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WEEL or RYLD?

RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for WEEL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WEEL or RYLD?

WEEL has the higher dividend yield at 12.72%, compared with 11.62% for RYLD.

What is the main difference between WEEL and RYLD?

They also come from different issuers: Tidal and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for WEEL and 0.60% for RYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.