PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEEL vs. RWL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WEEL vs. RWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF (WEEL) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WEEL vs. RWL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
WEEL
Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF
0.46%17.73%3.33%
RWL
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
1.02%18.65%6.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEEL achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than RWL's 1.02% return.


WEEL

1D
0.66%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
0.46%
6M
4.35%
1Y
19.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RWL

1D
0.29%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
1.02%
6M
4.77%
1Y
17.63%
3Y*
16.59%
5Y*
12.21%
10Y*
13.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WEEL vs. RWL - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEEL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RWL's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WEEL vs. RWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEEL
WEEL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
WEEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEEL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
WEEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEEL Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

RWL
RWL Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWL Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
RWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWL Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEEL vs. RWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF (WEEL) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WEELRWLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

1.17

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.90

1.71

+0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.25

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

1.57

-0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.51

7.53

+1.98

WEEL vs. RWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEEL Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the RWL Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEEL and RWL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WEELRWLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.17

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.55

+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between WEEL and RWL is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

WEEL vs. RWL - Dividend Comparison

WEEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.05%, more than RWL's 1.37% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WEEL
Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF
13.05%12.72%6.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RWL
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
1.37%1.35%1.43%1.60%1.62%1.35%1.75%1.87%1.99%1.60%1.71%1.97%

Drawdowns

WEEL vs. RWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEEL drawdown since its inception was -17.45%, smaller than the maximum RWL drawdown of -54.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEEL and RWL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WEELRWLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.45%

-54.83%

+37.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.87%

-11.26%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-4.46%

+2.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.54%

-6.50%

+4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

2.35%

-0.28%

Volatility

WEEL vs. RWL - Volatility Comparison

Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF (WEEL) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) have volatilities of 4.01% and 3.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WEELRWLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

3.93%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.43%

7.72%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.61%

15.11%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.25%

14.55%

-1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.25%

16.88%

-3.63%