WEBL vs. GUSH
WEBL (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares) and GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - WEBL tracks the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%) while GUSH tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WEBL returned -24.48%/yr vs 5.73%/yr for GUSH. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.17% expense ratio.
Performance
WEBL vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEBL achieves a -23.93% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 41.97% return.
WEBL
- 1D
- -3.84%
- 1M
- -20.51%
- YTD
- -23.93%
- 6M
- -26.32%
- 1Y
- -23.48%
- 3Y*
- 26.22%
- 5Y*
- -24.48%
- 10Y*
- —
GUSH
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -13.40%
- YTD
- 41.97%
- 6M
- 42.23%
- 1Y
- 37.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.70%
- 5Y*
- 5.73%
- 10Y*
- -35.96%
WEBL vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | -23.93% | 2.37% | 76.78% | 165.50% | -91.04% | 2.73% | 132.56% | 10.36% |
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 41.97% | -19.39% | -12.73% | -7.23% | 66.47% | 129.94% | -97.38% | 17.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEBL and GUSH is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019 | 0.23 |
The correlation between WEBL and GUSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WEBL vs. GUSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WEBL
GUSH
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
WEBL
GUSH
-
Communication Services
WEBL
GUSH
-
Consumer Cyclical
WEBL
GUSH
-
Financial Services
WEBL
GUSH
-
Industrials
WEBL
GUSH
-
Healthcare
WEBL
GUSH
-
Basic Materials
WEBL
-
GUSH
Consumer Defensive
WEBL
-
GUSH
-
Energy
WEBL
-
GUSH
Real Estate
WEBL
-
GUSH
-
Utilities
WEBL
-
GUSH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEBL vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank
WEBL
GUSH
WEBL vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WEBL | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.14 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 1.04 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 2.66 | -3.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WEBL vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEBL drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, smaller than the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBL and GUSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEBL | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.44% | -99.98% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.57% | -36.18% | -20.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.82% | -63.59% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.44% | -73.64% | -20.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.61% | -99.83% | +22.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.98% | -92.92% | +33.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.17% | 14.11% | +13.06% |
Volatility
WEBL vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) has a higher volatility of 22.67% compared to Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) at 16.93%. This indicates that WEBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEBL | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.67% | 16.93% | +5.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.74% | 44.19% | +2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.70% | 56.17% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.01% | 68.19% | +12.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.82% | 93.40% | -10.58% |
WEBL vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WEBL and GUSH have an expense ratio of 1.17%.
Dividends
WEBL vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison
WEBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than GUSH's 1.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 1.54% | 2.60% | 2.96% | 3.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.68% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 3.26% |
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | 0.21% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.79% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WEBL and GUSH have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WEBL has higher volatility (22.67%) compared to GUSH (16.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBL dropped -94.44% vs GUSH's -99.98%.
On 5-year performance, GUSH leads with 5.73% vs -24.48% for WEBL. Both ETFs have the same 1.17% expense ratio. On volatility, GUSH has been the lower-risk option at 16.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GUSH has performed better with a 5.73% return vs -24.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WEBL and GUSH have the same expense ratio: 1.17% per year.
GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.21% for WEBL.
WEBL tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%), while GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%).
GUSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WEBL and GUSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer