PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEBL vs. GUSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WEBL vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEBL achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 73.60% return.


WEBL

1D
0.57%
1M
13.84%
YTD
2.87%
6M
-0.58%
1Y
7.07%
3Y*
36.94%
5Y*
-16.60%
10Y*

GUSH

1D
0.03%
1M
-11.53%
YTD
73.60%
6M
49.22%
1Y
84.57%
3Y*
14.08%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
-36.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEBL vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WEBL
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares
2.87%2.37%76.78%165.50%-91.04%2.73%132.56%13.47%
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
73.60%-19.39%-12.73%-7.23%66.47%129.94%-97.38%10.99%

Correlation

The correlation between WEBL and GUSH is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019

0.23

The correlation between WEBL and GUSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WEBL vs. GUSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WEBL
GUSH

Technology

37.7%

-

Communication Services

29.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

27.7%

-

Financial Services

2.4%

-

Industrials

1.4%

-

Healthcare

1.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

2.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

97.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

WEBL
37.7%
GUSH

-

Communication Services

WEBL
29.7%
GUSH

-

Consumer Cyclical

WEBL
27.7%
GUSH

-

Financial Services

WEBL
2.4%
GUSH

-

Industrials

WEBL
1.4%
GUSH

-

Healthcare

WEBL
1.1%
GUSH

-

Basic Materials

WEBL

-

GUSH
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

WEBL

-

GUSH

-

Energy

WEBL

-

GUSH
97.2%

Real Estate

WEBL

-

GUSH

-

Utilities

WEBL

-

GUSH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEBL vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEBL
WEBL Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
WEBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEBL Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
WEBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEBL Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

GUSH
GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEBL vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WEBLGUSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.25

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

2.94

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.27

6.75

-6.47

WEBL vs. GUSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the GUSH Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEBL and GUSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WEBLGUSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

1.54

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

0.17

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

-0.44

+0.47

Drawdowns

WEBL vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEBL drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, smaller than the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBL and GUSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEBLGUSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.44%

-99.98%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.57%

-28.94%

-27.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.82%

-63.59%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.44%

-73.64%

-20.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.72%

-99.79%

+30.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.87%

-92.92%

+34.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.01%

12.58%

+13.43%

Volatility

WEBL vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) is 15.48%, while Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) has a volatility of 20.18%. This indicates that WEBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEBLGUSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.48%

20.18%

-4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.37%

43.32%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.62%

55.49%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.65%

68.21%

+12.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.85%

93.70%

-10.85%

WEBL vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WEBL and GUSH have an expense ratio of 1.17%.


Dividends

WEBL vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison

WEBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than GUSH's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
1.44%2.60%2.96%3.00%0.47%0.00%0.20%1.68%0.17%0.00%3.26%
WEBL
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares
0.19%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.79%0.00%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WEBL and GUSH have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GUSH has higher volatility (20.18%) compared to WEBL (15.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBL dropped -94.44% vs GUSH's -99.98%.

On 5-year performance, GUSH leads with 11.55% vs -16.60% for WEBL. Both ETFs have the same 1.17% expense ratio. On volatility, WEBL has been the lower-risk option at 15.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GUSH has performed better with a 11.55% return vs -16.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WEBL and GUSH have the same expense ratio: 1.17% per year.

GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.19% for WEBL.

WEBL tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%), while GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%).

GUSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEBL and GUSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer