WEBL vs. LABU
WEBL (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares) and LABU (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - WEBL tracks the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%) while LABU tracks the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WEBL returned -19.94%/yr vs -27.10%/yr for LABU. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. WEBL charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for LABU.
Performance
WEBL vs. LABU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEBL achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than LABU's 43.07% return.
WEBL
- 1D
- 9.12%
- 1M
- 16.81%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- -1.72%
- 3Y*
- 31.94%
- 5Y*
- -19.94%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.02%
LABU
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -24.85%
- 6M
- 29.38%
- YTD
- 43.07%
- 1Y
- 273.10%
- 3Y*
- 29.17%
- 5Y*
- -27.10%
- 10Y*
- -12.81%
- ALL TIME*
- -20.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $76.82M | $112.91M | $118.22M | |
| $5.15M | $4.84M | $6.44M |
WEBL vs. LABU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | 0.79% | 2.37% | 76.78% | 165.50% | -91.04% | 2.73% | 132.56% | 10.36% |
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 43.07% | 79.17% | -26.02% | -13.41% | -80.36% | -64.15% | 74.66% | 54.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEBL and LABU is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WEBL and LABU has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
WEBL vs. LABU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WEBL
LABU
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
WEBL
LABU
-
Consumer Cyclical
WEBL
LABU
-
Communication Services
WEBL
LABU
-
Financial Services
WEBL
LABU
Healthcare
WEBL
LABU
Industrials
WEBL
LABU
-
Basic Materials
WEBL
-
LABU
Consumer Defensive
WEBL
-
LABU
-
Energy
WEBL
-
LABU
-
Real Estate
WEBL
-
LABU
-
Utilities
WEBL
-
LABU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEBL vs. LABU — Risk / Return Rank
WEBL
LABU
WEBL vs. LABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WEBL | LABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.39 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 8.96 | -8.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 22.66 | -22.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WEBL vs. LABU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEBL drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, roughly equal to the maximum LABU drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBL and LABU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEBL | LABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.44% | -99.18% | +4.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.57% | -30.70% | -25.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.82% | -78.30% | +17.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.44% | -97.36% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.33% | -94.96% | +24.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.21% | -81.84% | +22.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.95% | 12.11% | +16.84% |
Volatility
WEBL vs. LABU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) is 19.20%, while Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a volatility of 23.16%. This indicates that WEBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LABU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEBL | LABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.20% | 23.16% | -3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.14% | 63.51% | -14.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.73% | 80.39% | -19.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.30% | 96.04% | -14.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.59% | 95.22% | -12.63% |
WEBL vs. LABU - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEBL has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than LABU's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
WEBL vs. LABU - Dividend Comparison
WEBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than LABU's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 0.44% | 0.84% | 0.35% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.64% | 0.17% |
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | 0.16% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.79% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WEBL and LABU have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LABU has higher volatility (23.16%) compared to WEBL (19.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBL dropped -94.44% vs LABU's -99.18%.
On 5-year performance, WEBL leads with -19.94% vs -27.10% for LABU. On fees, LABU is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, WEBL has been the lower-risk option at 19.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, WEBL has performed better with a -19.94% return vs -27.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LABU is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for WEBL.
LABU has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.16% for WEBL.
WEBL tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%), while LABU tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.17% for WEBL and 0.96% for LABU.
LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WEBL and LABU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer