WDS vs. SLV
WDS (Woodside Energy Group Ltd) is a stock, while SLV (iShares Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Over the past 10 years, WDS returned 7.93%/yr vs 13.99%/yr for SLV. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WDS vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDS achieves a 52.08% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -4.86% return. Over the past 10 years, WDS has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 7.93%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.
WDS
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 52.08%
- 6M
- 46.18%
- 1Y
- 58.11%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
SLV
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -22.76%
- YTD
- -4.86%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 85.39%
- 3Y*
- 41.27%
- 5Y*
- 18.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
WDS vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd | 52.08% | 6.78% | -20.60% | -4.42% | 68.06% | -6.77% | -24.23% | 14.38% | -9.70% | 19.32% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -4.86% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDS and SLV is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WDS and SLV has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDS vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
WDS
SLV
WDS vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDS | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.29 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 1.89 | +1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.88 | 4.10 | +3.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDS vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDS drawdown since its inception was -77.06%, roughly equal to the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDS and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDS | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.06% | -76.28% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.16% | -45.40% | +28.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.77% | -45.40% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.77% | -45.40% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.16% | -45.40% | -20.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.20% | -41.96% | +31.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.55% | -44.66% | +5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.40% | 20.88% | -13.48% |
Volatility
WDS vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) is 10.13%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.34%. This indicates that WDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDS | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 16.34% | -6.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.23% | 59.10% | -34.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.62% | 59.82% | -29.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.40% | 36.46% | -3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 32.00% | +1.78% |
Dividends
WDS vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
WDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd | 4.85% | 6.80% | 8.27% | 10.62% | 8.84% | 2.39% | 4.41% | 5.12% | 5.45% | 3.65% | 5.21% | 9.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDS and SLV have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to WDS (10.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDS dropped -77.06% vs SLV's -76.28%.
WDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WDS and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer