WDS vs. CME
WDS (Woodside Energy Group Ltd) and CME (CME Group Inc.) are both stocks. WDS operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while CME operates in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, WDS returned 7.93%/yr vs 15.38%/yr for CME. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WDS vs. CME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDS achieves a 52.08% return, which is significantly higher than CME's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, WDS has underperformed CME with an annualized return of 7.93%, while CME has yielded a comparatively higher 15.38% annualized return.
WDS
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 52.08%
- 6M
- 46.18%
- 1Y
- 58.11%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
CME
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -8.82%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- 15.38%
WDS vs. CME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd | 52.08% | 6.78% | -20.60% | -4.42% | 68.06% | -6.77% | -24.23% | 14.38% | -9.70% | 19.32% |
CME CME Group Inc. | 1.58% | 19.83% | 15.41% | 31.32% | -22.89% | 29.47% | -6.34% | 9.67% | 32.15% | 32.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDS and CME is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007 | 0.22 |
The correlation between WDS and CME shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (3 years) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WDS:
$44.17B
CME:
$97.90B
WDS:
$3.29
CME:
$11.75
WDS:
7.02
CME:
22.94
WDS:
0.24
CME:
2.00
WDS:
1.69
CME:
14.40
WDS:
1.23
CME:
3.68
WDS:
$26.15B
CME:
$6.76B
WDS:
$9.87B
CME:
$5.84B
WDS:
$17.06B
CME:
$5.69B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDS vs. CME — Risk / Return Rank
WDS
CME
WDS vs. CME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and CME Group Inc. (CME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDS | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.05 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 0.16 | +3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.88 | 0.50 | +7.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDS vs. CME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDS drawdown since its inception was -77.06%, roughly equal to the maximum CME drawdown of -77.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDS and CME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDS | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.06% | -77.50% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.16% | -21.42% | +4.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.77% | -21.42% | -27.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.77% | -31.74% | -17.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.16% | -37.36% | -28.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.20% | -15.03% | +4.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.55% | -20.68% | -18.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.40% | 6.70% | +0.70% |
Volatility
WDS vs. CME - Volatility Comparison
Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and CME Group Inc. (CME) have volatilities of 10.13% and 10.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDS | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 10.45% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.23% | 17.44% | +6.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.62% | 20.74% | +9.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.40% | 20.15% | +13.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 23.93% | +9.85% |
Dividends
WDS vs. CME - Dividend Comparison
WDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than CME's 4.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CME CME Group Inc. | 4.17% | 1.83% | 4.48% | 4.58% | 5.05% | 3.00% | 3.24% | 2.74% | 2.42% | 4.20% | 4.90% | 5.41% |
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd | 4.85% | 6.80% | 8.27% | 10.62% | 8.84% | 2.39% | 4.41% | 5.12% | 5.45% | 3.65% | 5.21% | 9.84% |
Financials
WDS vs. CME - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Woodside Energy Group Ltd and CME Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WDS vs. CME - Profitability Comparison
WDS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.99B and revenue of 6.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.1%.
CME - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.66B and revenue of 1.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.1%.
WDS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.1%.
CME - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 1.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 69.7%.
WDS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a net income of 1.40B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.
CME - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported a net income of 1.15B and revenue of 1.88B, resulting in a net margin of 61.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WDS and CME have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CME has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to WDS (10.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDS dropped -77.06% vs CME's -77.50%.
WDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WDS and CME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer