WDNA vs. XLVI
WDNA (WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund) and XLVI (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WDNA is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree BioRevolution Index, while XLVI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. WDNA is passively managed, while XLVI is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WDNA charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLVI.
Performance
WDNA vs. XLVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDNA achieves a 13.32% return, which is significantly higher than XLVI's 2.50% return.
WDNA
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 8.93%
- YTD
- 13.32%
- 6M
- 11.11%
- 1Y
- 50.90%
- 3Y*
- 5.47%
- 5Y*
- -5.03%
- 10Y*
- —
XLVI
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 2.50%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDNA vs. XLVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDNA WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund | 13.32% | 23.61% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 2.50% | 12.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDNA and XLVI is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.56 |
WDNA vs. XLVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WDNA
XLVI
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
WDNA
XLVI
Basic Materials
WDNA
XLVI
-
Consumer Defensive
WDNA
XLVI
-
Energy
WDNA
XLVI
-
Communication Services
WDNA
-
XLVI
-
Consumer Cyclical
WDNA
-
XLVI
-
Financial Services
WDNA
-
XLVI
Industrials
WDNA
-
XLVI
-
Real Estate
WDNA
-
XLVI
-
Technology
WDNA
-
XLVI
-
Utilities
WDNA
-
XLVI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDNA vs. XLVI — Risk / Return Rank
WDNA
XLVI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WDNA vs. XLVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDNA | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.80 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDNA vs. XLVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDNA drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than XLVI's maximum drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDNA and XLVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDNA | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -8.14% | -50.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.05% | -0.97% | -26.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.56% | -1.94% | -33.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.21% | — | — |
Volatility
WDNA vs. XLVI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDNA | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.90% | 11.06% | +14.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.14% | 11.06% | +14.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 11.06% | +14.00% |
WDNA vs. XLVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDNA has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLVI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDNA vs. XLVI - Dividend Comparison
WDNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, less than XLVI's 11.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDNA WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund | 4.03% | 4.57% | 0.75% | 0.80% | 0.38% | 0.10% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.17% | 5.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDNA and XLVI have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLVI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLVI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDNA.
XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.17%, compared with 4.03% for WDNA.
WDNA is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XLVI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDNA and 0.35% for XLVI.
Find the right allocation for WDNA and XLVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer