WDNA vs. AGNG
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) and Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG).
WDNA and AGNG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WDNA is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree BioRevolution Index. It was launched on Jun 3, 2021. AGNG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index. It was launched on May 9, 2016. Both WDNA and AGNG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WDNA or AGNG.
Key characteristics
| WDNA | AGNG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -3.67% | 13.58% |
| 1Y Return | 16.20% | 28.45% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -13.86% | 2.94% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.57 | 2.20 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.96 | 3.02 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.11 | 1.38 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.26 | 1.46 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.57 | 12.50 |
| Ulcer Index | 8.18% | 2.08% |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.67% | 11.82% |
| Max Drawdown | -51.90% | -30.58% |
| Current Drawdown | -41.10% | -2.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDNA and AGNG is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
WDNA vs. AGNG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, WDNA achieves a -3.67% return, which is significantly lower than AGNG's 13.58% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WDNA vs. AGNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDNA has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than AGNG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WDNA vs. AGNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) and Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WDNA vs. AGNG - Dividend Comparison
WDNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than AGNG's 0.70% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDNA WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund | 0.83% | 0.80% | 0.37% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AGNG Global X Aging Population ETF | 0.70% | 0.96% | 0.49% | 0.72% | 0.36% | 0.84% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 1.05% |
Drawdowns
WDNA vs. AGNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDNA drawdown since its inception was -51.90%, which is greater than AGNG's maximum drawdown of -30.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDNA and AGNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WDNA vs. AGNG - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) at 3.40%. This indicates that WDNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.