WDIV vs. POW
WDIV (SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WDIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. WDIV is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WDIV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
WDIV vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDIV achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 31.51% return.
WDIV
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 24.19%
- 3Y*
- 17.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- 7.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.24%
POW
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -10.55%
- 6M
- 14.53%
- YTD
- 31.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.21M | $2.19M | $3.04M | |
| $1.02M | $920.01K | $626.08K |
WDIV vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 13.12% | 3.25% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 31.51% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDIV and POW is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDIV vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
WDIV
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WDIV vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDIV | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.25 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDIV vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDIV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDIV and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDIV | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.34% | -28.02% | -14.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -22.73% | +21.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.79% | -5.52% | -0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | — | — |
Volatility
WDIV vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDIV | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.48% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.34% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.14% | 34.38% | -24.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.72% | 34.38% | -21.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.14% | 34.38% | -19.24% |
WDIV vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDIV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDIV vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
WDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than POW's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.15% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 4.10% | 4.27% | 4.63% | 4.73% | 5.12% | 4.15% | 5.55% | 3.99% | 4.42% | 3.62% | 4.32% | 5.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDIV and POW have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WDIV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WDIV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 0.15% for POW.
WDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDIV and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for WDIV and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer