PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDIV vs. HERD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDIV vs. HERD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDIV achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly lower than HERD's 12.05% return.


WDIV

1D
-1.21%
1M
1.41%
YTD
8.20%
6M
10.40%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
7.48%

HERD

1D
-0.52%
1M
3.45%
YTD
12.05%
6M
12.85%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDIV vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
8.20%27.16%7.61%8.21%-6.92%14.44%-10.18%10.58%
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
12.05%19.07%2.91%20.72%-6.96%28.58%10.71%7.36%

Correlation

The correlation between WDIV and HERD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019

0.67

The correlation between WDIV and HERD shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WDIV vs. HERD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WDIV
HERD

Financial Services

23.1%
0.0%

Utilities

13.8%
0.8%

Real Estate

13.3%
0.3%

Industrials

12.1%
13.4%

Communication Services

9.8%
8.3%

Energy

7.1%
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
8.2%

Healthcare

4.6%
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
15.6%

Basic Materials

3.1%
4.7%

Technology

2.9%
18.0%

Financial Services

WDIV
23.1%
HERD
0.0%

Utilities

WDIV
13.8%
HERD
0.8%

Real Estate

WDIV
13.3%
HERD
0.3%

Industrials

WDIV
12.1%
HERD
13.4%

Communication Services

WDIV
9.8%
HERD
8.3%

Energy

WDIV
7.1%
HERD
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

WDIV
6.4%
HERD
8.2%

Healthcare

WDIV
4.6%
HERD
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

WDIV
3.9%
HERD
15.6%

Basic Materials

WDIV
3.1%
HERD
4.7%

Technology

WDIV
2.9%
HERD
18.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDIV vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDIV
WDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

HERD
HERD Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HERD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERD Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HERD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDIV vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDIVHERDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.45

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

5.19

-2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

17.73

-8.34

WDIV vs. HERD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the HERD Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDIV and HERD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDIVHERDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.54

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.56

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.63

-0.17

Drawdowns

WDIV vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDIV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, which is greater than HERD's maximum drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDIV and HERD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDIVHERDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.34%

-39.41%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-5.68%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.26%

-18.90%

+7.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-21.60%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-0.67%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-4.55%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

1.66%

+0.67%

Volatility

WDIV vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) have volatilities of 2.95% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDIVHERDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

2.92%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

7.74%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.18%

11.62%

-1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.77%

17.76%

-4.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.40%

20.50%

-5.10%

WDIV vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDIV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HERD's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDIV vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison

WDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than HERD's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
3.13%3.75%2.43%2.54%2.50%2.02%1.95%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
4.04%4.27%4.63%4.73%5.12%4.15%5.55%3.99%4.42%3.62%4.32%5.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


WDIV and HERD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WDIV has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to HERD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDIV dropped -42.34% vs HERD's -39.41%.

On 5-year performance, HERD leads with 9.95% vs 7.57% for WDIV. On fees, WDIV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HERD has performed better with a 9.95% return vs 7.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WDIV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.

WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.04%, compared with 3.13% for HERD.

WDIV tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43, while HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDIV and 0.73% for HERD.

HERD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDIV and HERD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer