WDIV vs. HERD
WDIV (SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF) and HERD (Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF) are both Global Equities funds - WDIV tracks the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43 while HERD tracks the Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WDIV returned 7.57%/yr vs 9.95%/yr for HERD. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WDIV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for HERD.
Performance
WDIV vs. HERD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDIV achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly lower than HERD's 12.05% return.
WDIV
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 10.40%
- 1Y
- 21.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.57%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
HERD
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 6M
- 12.85%
- 1Y
- 29.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- —
WDIV vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 8.20% | 27.16% | 7.61% | 8.21% | -6.92% | 14.44% | -10.18% | 10.58% |
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 12.05% | 19.07% | 2.91% | 20.72% | -6.96% | 28.58% | 10.71% | 7.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDIV and HERD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.67 |
The correlation between WDIV and HERD shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WDIV vs. HERD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WDIV
HERD
Financial Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Financial Services
WDIV
HERD
Utilities
WDIV
HERD
Real Estate
WDIV
HERD
Industrials
WDIV
HERD
Communication Services
WDIV
HERD
Energy
WDIV
HERD
Consumer Defensive
WDIV
HERD
Healthcare
WDIV
HERD
Consumer Cyclical
WDIV
HERD
Basic Materials
WDIV
HERD
Technology
WDIV
HERD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDIV vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank
WDIV
HERD
WDIV vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WDIV | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.45 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 5.19 | -2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.39 | 17.73 | -8.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDIV | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 2.54 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.56 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.63 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
WDIV vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDIV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, which is greater than HERD's maximum drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDIV and HERD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDIV | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.34% | -39.41% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.61% | -5.68% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.26% | -18.90% | +7.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.12% | -21.60% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | -0.67% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | -4.55% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 1.66% | +0.67% |
Volatility
WDIV vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) have volatilities of 2.95% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDIV | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 2.92% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.01% | 7.74% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.18% | 11.62% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.77% | 17.76% | -4.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.40% | 20.50% | -5.10% |
WDIV vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDIV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HERD's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDIV vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison
WDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than HERD's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 3.13% | 3.75% | 2.43% | 2.54% | 2.50% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 4.04% | 4.27% | 4.63% | 4.73% | 5.12% | 4.15% | 5.55% | 3.99% | 4.42% | 3.62% | 4.32% | 5.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDIV and HERD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WDIV has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to HERD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDIV dropped -42.34% vs HERD's -39.41%.
On 5-year performance, HERD leads with 9.95% vs 7.57% for WDIV. On fees, WDIV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HERD has performed better with a 9.95% return vs 7.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WDIV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.
WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.04%, compared with 3.13% for HERD.
WDIV tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43, while HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDIV and 0.73% for HERD.
HERD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WDIV and HERD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer