PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDIV vs. HERD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDIV vs. HERD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDIV achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly lower than HERD's 14.97% return.


WDIV

1D
-0.95%
1M
3.48%
6M
7.94%
YTD
13.12%
1Y
24.19%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*
7.59%
ALL TIME*
7.24%

HERD

1D
-0.45%
1M
4.23%
6M
10.58%
YTD
14.97%
1Y
29.21%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$194.03K$197.87K$182.95K
$1.02M$920.01K$626.08K

WDIV vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
13.12%27.16%7.61%8.21%-6.92%14.44%-10.18%9.51%
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
14.97%19.07%2.91%20.72%-6.96%28.58%10.71%6.95%

Correlation

The correlation between WDIV and HERD is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019

0.66

The correlation between WDIV and HERD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

WDIV vs. HERD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WDIV
HERD

Financial Services

22.5%
0.0%

Utilities

13.8%
1.3%

Real Estate

12.8%
0.4%

Industrials

11.8%
11.9%

Communication Services

9.4%
8.8%

Energy

7.1%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
10.1%

Technology

4.6%
16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
17.8%

Healthcare

3.9%
16.9%

Basic Materials

3.4%
6.2%

Financial Services

WDIV
22.5%
HERD
0.0%

Utilities

WDIV
13.8%
HERD
1.3%

Real Estate

WDIV
12.8%
HERD
0.4%

Industrials

WDIV
11.8%
HERD
11.9%

Communication Services

WDIV
9.4%
HERD
8.8%

Energy

WDIV
7.1%
HERD
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

WDIV
6.6%
HERD
10.1%

Technology

WDIV
4.6%
HERD
16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

WDIV
4.2%
HERD
17.8%

Healthcare

WDIV
3.9%
HERD
16.9%

Basic Materials

WDIV
3.4%
HERD
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDIV vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WDIV
WDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
WDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
WDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

HERD
HERD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HERD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HERD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WDIV vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WDIVHERDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

5.01

-2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.25

15.56

-5.31

WDIV vs. HERD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the HERD Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDIV and HERD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WDIV vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDIV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, which is greater than HERD's maximum drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDIV and HERD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDIVHERDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.34%

-39.41%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-5.68%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.20%

-18.90%

+9.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-21.60%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-0.70%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.79%

-4.50%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

1.83%

+0.48%

Volatility

WDIV vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) is 2.48%, while Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that WDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HERD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDIVHERDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

3.60%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.34%

8.72%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.14%

11.83%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.72%

17.68%

-4.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.14%

20.36%

-5.22%

WDIV vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDIV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HERD's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDIV vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison

WDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than HERD's 2.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
2.73%3.75%2.43%2.54%2.50%2.02%1.95%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
4.10%4.27%4.63%4.73%5.12%4.15%5.55%3.99%4.42%3.62%4.32%5.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


WDIV and HERD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HERD has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to WDIV (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDIV dropped -42.34% vs HERD's -39.41%.

On 5-year performance, HERD leads with 10.62% vs 9.32% for WDIV. On fees, WDIV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, WDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HERD has performed better with a 10.62% return vs 9.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WDIV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.

WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 2.73% for HERD.

WDIV tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index, while HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDIV and 0.73% for HERD.

HERD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDIV and HERD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer