WDIV vs. GGRW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WDIV (SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF) and GGRW (Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WDIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43, while GGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by GAMCO Investors, Inc.. WDIV is passively managed, while GGRW is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, WDIV returned 7.89%/yr vs 7.88%/yr for GGRW. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WDIV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for GGRW.

Performance

WDIV vs. GGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDIV achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly higher than GGRW's 3.63% return.

WDIV

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.69%
• YTD: 7.89%
• 6M: 7.85%
• 1Y: 19.92%
• 3Y*: 17.68%
• 5Y*: 7.89%
• 10Y*: 7.81%

GGRW

• 1D: -2.33%
• 1M: -1.24%
• YTD: 3.63%
• 6M: 2.74%
• 1Y: 13.84%
• 3Y*: 24.99%
• 5Y*: 7.88%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDIV vs. GGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF	7.89%	27.16%	7.61%	8.21%	-6.92%	9.30%
GGRW Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF	3.63%	18.29%	41.78%	42.19%	-43.92%	5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between WDIV and GGRW is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2021	0.46

WDIV vs. GGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WDIV	GGRW
Financial Services	19.1%	9.5%
Real Estate	8.2%	-
Utilities	7.5%	4.3%
Energy	7.4%	-
Industrials	6.0%	11.8%
Communication Services	5.1%	13.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	0.6%
Basic Materials	4.5%	1.2%
Consumer Cyclical	3.9%	9.6%
Technology	2.4%	38.0%
Healthcare	2.2%	7.8%

Return for Risk

WDIV vs. GGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDIV

WDIV Risk / Return Rank: 57
WDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
WDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
WDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 60
WDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
WDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 52

GGRW

GGRW Risk / Return Rank: 25
GGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
GGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
GGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 24
GGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
GGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDIV vs. GGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WDIV	GGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	0.88	+1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	1.30	+1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.16	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	1.05	+1.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.53	3.92	+4.61

WDIV vs. GGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the GGRW Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDIV and GGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WDIV vs. GGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDIV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, smaller than the maximum GGRW drawdown of -50.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDIV and GGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	WDIV	GGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.34%	-50.28%	+7.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.61%	-13.19%	+4.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.26%	-20.53%	+9.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.12%	-50.28%	+28.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.94%	-3.40%	+1.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.83%	-17.23%	+11.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	3.54%	-1.20%

Volatility

WDIV vs. GGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) is 3.05%, while Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that WDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WDIV	GGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.05%	6.31%	-3.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.32%	12.69%	-4.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.29%	15.74%	-5.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.77%	25.43%	-12.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.24%	25.50%	-10.26%

WDIV vs. GGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDIV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GGRW's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

WDIV vs. GGRW - Dividend Comparison

WDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than GGRW's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GGRW Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF	0.41%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF	4.29%	4.27%	4.63%	4.73%	5.12%	4.15%	5.55%	3.99%	4.42%	3.62%	4.32%	5.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WDIV and GGRW in my portfolio?

WDIV and GGRW have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WDIV or GGRW?

GGRW has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to WDIV (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDIV dropped -42.34% vs GGRW's -50.28%.

Which ETF is better, WDIV or GGRW?

On 5-year performance, WDIV leads with 7.89% vs 7.88% for GGRW. On fees, WDIV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, WDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WDIV or GGRW?

Over the 5-year period, WDIV has performed better with a 7.89% return vs 7.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WDIV or GGRW?

WDIV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GGRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WDIV or GGRW?

WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 0.41% for GGRW.

What is the main difference between WDIV and GGRW?

WDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while GGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and GAMCO Investors, Inc.. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDIV and 0.90% for GGRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.