PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GGRW vs. SMH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GGRWSMH
YTD Return23.69%33.76%
1Y Return52.17%86.62%
3Y Return (Ann)5.42%27.80%
Sharpe Ratio2.993.03
Daily Std Dev17.44%28.58%
Max Drawdown-50.28%-95.73%
Current Drawdown-9.83%-0.12%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between GGRW and SMH is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

GGRW vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GGRW achieves a 23.69% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 33.76% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3.96%
90.00%
GGRW
SMH

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF

VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF

GGRW vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGRW has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


GGRW
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF
Expense ratio chart for GGRW: current value at 0.90% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.90%
Expense ratio chart for SMH: current value at 0.35% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GGRW vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGRW
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GGRW, currently valued at 2.99, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.99
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GGRW, currently valued at 3.90, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.003.90
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GGRW, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.51
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GGRW, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.001.28
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GGRW, currently valued at 16.94, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.0016.94
SMH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SMH, currently valued at 3.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.003.03
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SMH, currently valued at 3.91, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.003.91
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SMH, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.47
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SMH, currently valued at 4.68, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.004.68
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SMH, currently valued at 15.47, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.0015.47

GGRW vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGRW Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which roughly equals the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of GGRW and SMH.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.99
3.03
GGRW
SMH

Dividends

GGRW vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

GGRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GGRW
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF
0.45%0.60%2.37%1.02%1.38%6.00%3.75%2.85%1.61%4.28%2.31%3.11%

Drawdowns

GGRW vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGRW drawdown since its inception was -50.28%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -95.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRW and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-9.83%
-0.12%
GGRW
SMH

Volatility

GGRW vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) is 6.42%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 10.02%. This indicates that GGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6.42%
10.02%
GGRW
SMH