PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGRW vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GGRW vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GGRW vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GGRW
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF
-6.65%18.29%41.78%42.19%-43.92%5.40%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
8.84%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%21.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGRW achieves a -6.65% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 8.84% return.


GGRW

1D
1.18%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
-6.65%
6M
-6.45%
1Y
16.38%
3Y*
24.77%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*

SMH

1D
2.24%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
8.84%
6M
17.83%
1Y
85.04%
3Y*
44.53%
5Y*
26.15%
10Y*
31.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GGRW vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGRW has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GGRW vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGRW
GGRW Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGRW vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGRWSMHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

2.32

-1.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.29

2.92

-1.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.41

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

5.39

-4.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.82

19.22

-14.40

GGRW vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGRW Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGRW and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGRWSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

2.32

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.76

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.28

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between GGRW and SMH is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GGRW vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

GGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than SMH's 0.28% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGRW
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF
0.46%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.28%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Drawdowns

GGRW vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGRW drawdown since its inception was -50.28%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRW and SMH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GGRWSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.28%

-84.96%

+34.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.19%

-15.95%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.28%

-45.30%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.13%

-8.02%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.91%

-41.35%

+23.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

4.47%

-0.90%

Volatility

GGRW vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) is 6.64%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.74%. This indicates that GGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GGRWSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

11.74%

-5.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

24.02%

-12.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.20%

36.88%

-16.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.47%

34.68%

-9.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.77%

32.29%

-6.52%