GGRW vs. MOAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT).
GGRW and MOAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GGRW is an actively managed fund by GAMCO Investors, Inc.. It was launched on Feb 16, 2021. MOAT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2012.
Performance
GGRW vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GGRW vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGRW Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF | -6.65% | 18.29% | 41.78% | 42.19% | -43.92% | 5.40% |
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -6.87% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 15.17% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GGRW having a -6.65% return and MOAT slightly lower at -6.87%.
GGRW
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- -4.93%
- YTD
- -6.65%
- 6M
- -6.45%
- 1Y
- 16.38%
- 3Y*
- 24.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- —
MOAT
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -9.39%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- -2.70%
- 1Y
- 11.53%
- 3Y*
- 10.62%
- 5Y*
- 7.92%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GGRW vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGRW has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GGRW vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank
GGRW
MOAT
GGRW vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGRW | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 0.59 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | 0.98 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.13 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 0.83 | +0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.82 | 3.12 | +1.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGRW | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 0.59 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.44 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.75 | -0.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between GGRW and MOAT is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GGRW vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
GGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than MOAT's 1.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGRW Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.46% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
Drawdowns
GGRW vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGRW drawdown since its inception was -50.28%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRW and MOAT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGRW | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.28% | -33.31% | -16.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.19% | -13.30% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.28% | -23.96% | -26.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.13% | -10.42% | +1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.91% | -3.80% | -14.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 3.55% | +0.02% |
Volatility
GGRW vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.78%. This indicates that GGRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GGRW | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 4.78% | +1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.56% | 10.10% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 19.76% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.47% | 18.09% | +7.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.77% | 18.71% | +7.06% |