GGRW vs. MOAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT).
GGRW and MOAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GGRW is an actively managed fund by GAMCO Investors, Inc.. It was launched on Feb 16, 2021. MOAT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2012.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GGRW or MOAT.
Key characteristics
| GGRW | MOAT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 22.93% | 5.55% |
| 1Y Return | 49.23% | 21.27% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.21% | 8.29% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.93 | 1.75 |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.46% | 13.32% |
| Max Drawdown | -50.28% | -33.31% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.38% | -0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGRW and MOAT is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GGRW vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GGRW achieves a 22.93% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's 5.55% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GGRW vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGRW has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GGRW vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GGRW vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
GGRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGRW Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 0.81% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% | 1.34% | 0.79% |
Drawdowns
GGRW vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGRW drawdown since its inception was -50.28%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRW and MOAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GGRW vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 2.41%. This indicates that GGRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.