WCME vs. EEMO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WCME (First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF) and EEMO (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WCME is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while EEMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, WCME returned 29.03% vs 51.13% for EEMO. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WCME charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for EEMO.

Performance

WCME vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF (WCME) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCME achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly lower than EEMO's 36.85% return.

WCME

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 2.08%
• YTD: 14.24%
• 6M: 14.00%
• 1Y: 29.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EEMO

• 1D: -2.42%
• 1M: 10.83%
• YTD: 36.85%
• 6M: 37.37%
• 1Y: 51.13%
• 3Y*: 24.00%
• 5Y*: 6.67%
• 10Y*: 8.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCME vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WCME First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF	14.24%	35.19%	-10.72%
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	36.85%	10.99%	-3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between WCME and EEMO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2024	0.76

The correlation between WCME and EEMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

WCME vs. EEMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WCME	EEMO
Technology	32.4%	43.8%
Financial Services	16.9%	18.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.6%	3.2%
Healthcare	11.0%	3.0%
Industrials	8.7%	11.5%
Basic Materials	6.5%	12.9%
Energy	5.0%	2.5%
Communication Services	3.6%	1.5%
Utilities	3.2%	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	1.2%
Real Estate	-	0.5%

Return for Risk

WCME vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCME

WCME Risk / Return Rank: 41
WCME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
WCME Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
WCME Omega Ratio Rank: 42
WCME Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
WCME Martin Ratio Rank: 42

EEMO

EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 69
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCME vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF (WCME) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WCME	EEMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	2.09	-0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	2.97	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.42	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	3.48	-1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.64	13.93	-7.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WCME vs. EEMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCME Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the EEMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCME and EEMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WCME	EEMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45	2.09	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.09	0.13	+0.97

Drawdowns

WCME vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCME drawdown since its inception was -15.64%, smaller than the maximum EEMO drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCME and EEMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCME	EEMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.64%	-48.47%	+32.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.64%	-14.75%	-0.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.03%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.93%	-3.71%	+0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.67%	-20.17%	+16.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.38%	3.68%	+0.70%

Volatility

WCME vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF (WCME) is 7.98%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that WCME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCME	EEMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.98%	14.18%	-6.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.23%	22.26%	-5.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.17%	24.58%	-4.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.72%	19.36%	+0.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.72%	21.59%	-1.87%

WCME vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCME has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

WCME vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison

WCME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than EEMO's 1.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	1.68%	2.31%	2.57%	3.65%	3.82%	1.51%	1.53%	2.13%	13.10%	5.13%	1.55%	2.92%
WCME First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF	0.60%	0.68%	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WCME and EEMO in my portfolio?

WCME and EEMO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WCME or EEMO?

EEMO has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to WCME (7.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCME dropped -15.64% vs EEMO's -48.47%.

Which ETF is better, WCME or EEMO?

On 1-year performance, EEMO leads with 51.13% vs 29.03% for WCME. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, WCME has been the lower-risk option at 7.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WCME or EEMO?

Over the 1-year period, EEMO has performed better with a 51.13% return vs 29.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WCME or EEMO?

EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WCME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WCME or EEMO?

EEMO has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.60% for WCME.

What is the main difference between WCME and EEMO?

WCME is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EEMO is Momentum. WCME tracks Actively Managed, while EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WCME and 0.31% for EEMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EEMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.