PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCME vs. BDRY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCME vs. BDRY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF (WCME) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCME achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly lower than BDRY's 32.04% return.


WCME

1D
1.04%
1M
5.83%
YTD
17.58%
6M
19.22%
1Y
34.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BDRY

1D
0.09%
1M
-8.64%
YTD
32.04%
6M
30.41%
1Y
102.09%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
-16.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCME vs. BDRY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
WCME
First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF
17.58%35.19%-10.72%
BDRY
Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF
32.04%44.24%-40.74%

Correlation

The correlation between WCME and BDRY is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2024

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCME vs. BDRY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCME
WCME Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
WCME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCME Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCME Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
WCME Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCME Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

BDRY
BDRY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BDRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDRY Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BDRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDRY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCME vs. BDRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF (WCME) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WCMEBDRYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.36

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

4.75

-2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.51

13.45

-5.94

WCME vs. BDRY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCME Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the BDRY Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCME and BDRY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WCME vs. BDRY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCME drawdown since its inception was -15.64%, smaller than the maximum BDRY drawdown of -89.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCME and BDRY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCMEBDRYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.64%

-89.16%

+73.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.64%

-21.60%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-72.10%

+72.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-58.42%

+54.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

7.62%

-3.05%

Volatility

WCME vs. BDRY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF (WCME) has a higher volatility of 10.59% compared to Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) at 7.86%. This indicates that WCME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDRY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCMEBDRYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.59%

7.86%

+2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.34%

29.21%

-9.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.05%

42.17%

-20.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.68%

60.25%

-39.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.68%

62.41%

-41.73%

WCME vs. BDRY - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCME has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BDRY's 3.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCME vs. BDRY - Dividend Comparison

WCME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while BDRY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
BDRY
Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
WCME
First Trust WCM Developing World Equity ETF
0.58%0.68%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


WCME and BDRY have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WCME has higher volatility (10.59%) compared to BDRY (7.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCME dropped -15.64% vs BDRY's -89.16%.

On 1-year performance, BDRY leads with 102.09% vs 34.19% for WCME. On fees, WCME is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BDRY has been the lower-risk option at 7.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BDRY has performed better with a 102.09% return vs 34.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WCME is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 3.76% for BDRY.

WCME has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.00% for BDRY.

WCME is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while BDRY is Commodities. WCME tracks Actively Managed, while BDRY tracks Breakwave Dry Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WCME and 3.76% for BDRY.

BDRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCME and BDRY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer