WCCFX vs. PALDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WCCFX (Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund) and PALDX (PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, WCCFX returned 1.86%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for PALDX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WCCFX charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for PALDX.

Performance

WCCFX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund (WCCFX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCCFX achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly lower than PALDX's 7.89% return.

WCCFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.38%
• YTD: 5.78%
• 6M: 5.70%
• 1Y: 12.93%
• 3Y*: 7.07%
• 5Y*: 1.86%
• 10Y*: 2.85%

PALDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.48%
• YTD: 7.89%
• 6M: 8.39%
• 1Y: 20.92%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCCFX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WCCFX Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund	5.78%	8.15%	3.29%	5.96%	-13.92%	2.63%	8.75%	10.72%	-4.34%	1.02%
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	7.89%	13.62%	18.96%	18.90%	-15.65%	16.30%	10.68%	22.27%	-4.12%	5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between WCCFX and PALDX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017	0.71

The correlation between WCCFX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WCCFX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCCFX

WCCFX Risk / Return Rank: 70
WCCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
WCCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
WCCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WCCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
WCCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

PALDX

PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 83
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCCFX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund (WCCFX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WCCFX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.73	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	3.92	-0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.52	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.31	3.62	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.65	17.16	-5.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WCCFX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCCFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCCFX and PALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WCCFX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	2.73	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.79	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.81	-0.46

Drawdowns

WCCFX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCCFX drawdown since its inception was -17.64%, smaller than the maximum PALDX drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCCFX and PALDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCCFX	PALDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.64%	-26.16%	+8.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.01%	-5.96%	+2.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.93%	-16.06%	+10.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.64%	-20.47%	+2.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	-4.09%	-0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	1.25%	-0.14%

Volatility

WCCFX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund (WCCFX) is 2.12%, while PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that WCCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCCFX	PALDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.12%	2.30%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.77%	6.18%	-2.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.39%	7.89%	-2.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.87%	12.11%	-6.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.16%	12.69%	-7.53%

WCCFX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCCFX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

WCCFX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

WCCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than PALDX's 5.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	5.02%	5.42%	10.40%	2.94%	6.19%	6.87%	2.58%	4.58%	3.65%	1.48%
WCCFX Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund	2.57%	2.99%	2.56%	2.22%	3.41%	5.98%	6.19%	1.81%	5.05%	5.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WCCFX and PALDX in my portfolio?

WCCFX and PALDX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WCCFX or PALDX?

PALDX has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to WCCFX (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCCFX dropped -17.64% vs PALDX's -26.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.