WCCFX vs. PALDX
WCCFX (Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund) and PALDX (PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, WCCFX returned 0.80%/yr vs 8.53%/yr for PALDX. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. WCCFX charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for PALDX.
Performance
WCCFX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCCFX achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than PALDX's 6.54% return.
WCCFX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- 6M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 7.14%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- 2.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.44%
PALDX
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 6.54%
- 1Y
- 15.23%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
WCCFX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCCFX Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund | 1.83% | 8.15% | 3.29% | 5.96% | -13.92% | 2.63% | 8.75% | 10.72% | -4.34% | 0.93% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 6.54% | 13.62% | 18.96% | 18.90% | -15.65% | 16.30% | 10.68% | 22.27% | -4.12% | 5.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCCFX and PALDX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2017 | 0.71 |
The correlation between WCCFX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCCFX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank
WCCFX
PALDX
WCCFX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund (WCCFX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WCCFX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.31 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 2.42 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.61 | 10.80 | -6.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WCCFX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCCFX drawdown since its inception was -17.64%, smaller than the maximum PALDX drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCCFX and PALDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCCFX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.64% | -26.16% | +8.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.35% | -5.96% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.88% | -16.06% | +11.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.64% | -20.47% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.73% | -1.25% | -2.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.65% | -4.03% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.42% | 1.34% | +0.08% |
Volatility
WCCFX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund (WCCFX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) have volatilities of 2.38% and 2.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCCFX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.38% | 2.39% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.96% | 6.95% | -1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.35% | 8.59% | -2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.08% | 12.20% | -6.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.25% | 12.65% | -7.40% |
WCCFX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCCFX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCCFX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison
WCCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than PALDX's 5.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 5.09% | 5.42% | 10.40% | 2.94% | 6.19% | 6.87% | 2.58% | 4.58% | 3.65% | 1.48% |
WCCFX Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund | 2.49% | 2.99% | 2.56% | 2.22% | 3.41% | 5.98% | 6.19% | 1.81% | 5.05% | 5.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WCCFX and PALDX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PALDX has higher volatility (2.39%) compared to WCCFX (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCCFX dropped -17.64% vs PALDX's -26.16%.
PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WCCFX and PALDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer