WCBR vs. GINN

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

WCBR (WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund) and GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - WCBR tracks the WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index while GINN tracks the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WCBR returned 5.57%/yr vs 5.32%/yr for GINN. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WCBR charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GINN.

Performance

WCBR vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCBR achieves a 16.06% return, which is significantly higher than GINN's 4.77% return.

WCBR

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 16.06%
• 6M: 14.01%
• 1Y: 2.86%
• 3Y*: 19.71%
• 5Y*: 5.57%
• 10Y*: —

GINN

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -2.16%
• YTD: 4.77%
• 6M: 3.25%
• 1Y: 17.26%
• 3Y*: 18.20%
• 5Y*: 5.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCBR vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	16.06%	-1.44%	11.42%	66.63%	-41.96%	7.65%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	4.77%	20.25%	18.71%	29.94%	-32.40%	5.44%

Correlation

The correlation between WCBR and GINN is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between WCBR and GINN has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WCBR vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WCBR	GINN
Technology	100.0%	32.6%
Basic Materials	-	0.1%
Communication Services	-	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.8%
Energy	-	1.7%
Financial Services	-	12.4%
Healthcare	-	20.6%
Industrials	-	4.7%
Real Estate	-	0.6%
Utilities	-	1.7%

Return for Risk

WCBR vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCBR

WCBR Risk / Return Rank: 10
WCBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
WCBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
WCBR Omega Ratio Rank: 11
WCBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
WCBR Martin Ratio Rank: 10

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 31
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 30
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCBR vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WCBR	GINN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	1.06	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.34	1.53	-1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.19	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.10	1.31	-1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.21	4.60	-4.38

WCBR vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the GINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCBR and GINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WCBR vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCBR drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, which is greater than GINN's maximum drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCBR and GINN.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCBR	GINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.25%	-41.25%	-11.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.92%	-13.18%	-16.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.27%	-22.25%	-8.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.25%	-41.25%	-11.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.65%	-5.13%	-7.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.26%	-13.27%	-6.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.33%	3.76%	+9.57%

Volatility

WCBR vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) has a higher volatility of 13.92% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 5.76%. This indicates that WCBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCBR	GINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.92%	5.76%	+8.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.72%	12.88%	+14.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.63%	16.55%	+16.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.66%	21.43%	+12.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.52%	21.06%	+12.46%

WCBR vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCBR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

WCBR vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

WCBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.20%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.03%	0.43%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WCBR and GINN in my portfolio?

WCBR and GINN have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WCBR or GINN?

WCBR has higher volatility (13.92%) compared to GINN (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCBR dropped -52.25% vs GINN's -41.25%.

Which ETF is better, WCBR or GINN?

On 5-year performance, WCBR leads with 5.57% vs 5.32% for GINN. On fees, WCBR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 5.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WCBR or GINN?

Over the 5-year period, WCBR has performed better with a 5.57% return vs 5.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WCBR or GINN?

WCBR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WCBR or GINN?

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.00% for WCBR.

What is the main difference between WCBR and GINN?

WCBR tracks WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WCBR and 0.50% for GINN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GINN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.