WCBR vs. HACK
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK).
WCBR and HACK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WCBR is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Jan 28, 2021. HACK is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Cyber Defense Index. It was launched on Nov 11, 2014. Both WCBR and HACK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
WCBR vs. HACK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WCBR vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund | -10.44% | -1.44% | 11.42% | 66.63% | -41.96% | 6.99% |
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | -6.57% | 7.97% | 23.49% | 37.44% | -28.16% | 1.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCBR achieves a -10.44% return, which is significantly lower than HACK's -6.57% return.
WCBR
- 1D
- 3.56%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- -10.44%
- 6M
- -20.50%
- 1Y
- -7.95%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 2.93%
- 10Y*
- —
HACK
- 1D
- 3.66%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- -6.57%
- 6M
- -13.43%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- 16.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WCBR vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCBR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WCBR vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank
WCBR
HACK
WCBR vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WCBR | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | 0.18 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | 0.44 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.06 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 0.18 | -0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 0.49 | -1.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WCBR | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | 0.18 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.27 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.46 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between WCBR and HACK is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WCBR vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison
WCBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.14% | 0.20% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% |
Drawdowns
WCBR vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCBR drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, which is greater than HACK's maximum drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCBR and HACK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCBR | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.25% | -42.68% | -9.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.17% | -20.67% | -7.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.25% | -38.68% | -13.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.50% | -15.73% | -7.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.57% | -11.70% | -8.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.20% | 7.75% | +3.45% |
Volatility
WCBR vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) has a higher volatility of 10.01% compared to ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) at 8.05%. This indicates that WCBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WCBR | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.01% | 8.05% | +1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.84% | 17.03% | +4.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.56% | 26.02% | +4.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.85% | 23.31% | +9.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.00% | 22.85% | +10.15% |