WCBR vs. HACK

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

WCBR (WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund) and HACK (Amplify Cybersecurity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - WCBR tracks the WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index while HACK tracks the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WCBR returned 5.22%/yr vs 9.32%/yr for HACK. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WCBR charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for HACK.

Performance

WCBR vs. HACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCBR achieves a 13.66% return, which is significantly lower than HACK's 17.93% return.

WCBR

• 1D: -1.65%
• 1M: -3.17%
• YTD: 13.66%
• 6M: 10.28%
• 1Y: 2.64%
• 3Y*: 18.88%
• 5Y*: 5.22%
• 10Y*: —

HACK

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: 17.93%
• 6M: 15.15%
• 1Y: 15.09%
• 3Y*: 24.64%
• 5Y*: 9.32%
• 10Y*: 15.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCBR vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	13.66%	-1.44%	11.42%	66.63%	-41.96%	7.65%
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF	17.93%	7.97%	23.49%	37.44%	-28.16%	-1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between WCBR and HACK is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021	0.92

The correlation between WCBR and HACK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

WCBR vs. HACK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WCBR	HACK
Technology	100.0%	92.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	7.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

WCBR vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCBR

WCBR Risk / Return Rank: 10
WCBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
WCBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
WCBR Omega Ratio Rank: 10
WCBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
WCBR Martin Ratio Rank: 9

HACK

HACK Risk / Return Rank: 17
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 18
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCBR vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WCBR	HACK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.08	0.58	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.34	0.95	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.12	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.09	0.73	-0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.20	1.72	-1.52

WCBR vs. HACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the HACK Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCBR and HACK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WCBR vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCBR drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, which is greater than HACK's maximum drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCBR and HACK.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCBR	HACK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.25%	-42.68%	-9.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.92%	-20.67%	-9.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.27%	-21.90%	-8.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.25%	-38.68%	-13.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.46%	-10.05%	-4.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.27%	-11.62%	-8.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.28%	8.78%	+4.50%

Volatility

WCBR vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) has a higher volatility of 14.04% compared to Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) at 11.78%. This indicates that WCBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCBR	HACK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.04%	11.78%	+2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.70%	21.94%	+5.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.66%	26.09%	+6.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.66%	24.29%	+9.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.53%	23.32%	+10.21%

WCBR vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCBR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

WCBR vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison

WCBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF	0.06%	0.07%	0.14%	0.20%	0.24%	0.26%	1.11%	0.14%	0.09%	0.01%	1.23%
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.03%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WCBR and HACK in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, WCBR and HACK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, WCBR or HACK?

WCBR has higher volatility (14.04%) compared to HACK (11.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCBR dropped -52.25% vs HACK's -42.68%.

Which ETF is better, WCBR or HACK?

On 5-year performance, HACK leads with 9.32% vs 5.22% for WCBR. On fees, WCBR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, HACK has been the lower-risk option at 11.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WCBR or HACK?

Over the 5-year period, HACK has performed better with a 9.32% return vs 5.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WCBR or HACK?

WCBR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HACK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WCBR or HACK?

HACK has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for WCBR.

What is the main difference between WCBR and HACK?

WCBR tracks WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index, while HACK tracks Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WCBR and 0.60% for HACK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HACK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.