WCBR vs. FNGS

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

WCBR (WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund) and FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - WCBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index, while FNGS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WCBR returned 8.16%/yr vs 19.42%/yr for FNGS. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. WCBR charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FNGS.

Performance

WCBR vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCBR achieves a 38.04% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's 12.53% return.

WCBR

• 1D: 3.28%
• 1M: 3.11%
• 6M: 45.67%
• YTD: 38.04%
• 1Y: 27.65%
• 3Y*: 24.81%
• 5Y*: 8.16%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.63%

FNGS

• 1D: 3.22%
• 1M: 3.83%
• 6M: 16.07%
• YTD: 12.53%
• 1Y: 19.17%
• 3Y*: 31.24%
• 5Y*: 19.42%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 31.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	$1.70M	$1.91M	$2.41M
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	$2.26M	$1.99M	$1.49M

WCBR vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	38.04%	-1.44%	11.42%	66.63%	-41.96%	7.65%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	12.53%	18.64%	51.99%	95.24%	-40.32%	12.43%

Correlation

The correlation between WCBR and FNGS is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021	0.67

The correlation between WCBR and FNGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WCBR vs. FNGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WCBR	FNGS
Technology	100.0%	59.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	30.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	10.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

WCBR vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WCBR

WCBR Risk / Return Rank: 30
WCBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
WCBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
WCBR Omega Ratio Rank: 32
WCBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
WCBR Martin Ratio Rank: 26

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 31
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WCBR vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WCBR	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	0.84	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	1.29	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.16	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.93	0.84	+0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.09	2.23	-0.14

WCBR vs. FNGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCBR and FNGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WCBR vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCBR drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCBR and FNGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCBR	FNGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.25%	-48.98%	-3.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.92%	-22.93%	-6.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.27%	-26.77%	-3.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.25%	-48.98%	-3.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.94%	-4.76%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.96%	-10.80%	-9.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.27%	8.61%	+4.66%

Volatility

WCBR vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) has a higher volatility of 11.32% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 6.65%. This indicates that WCBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCBR	FNGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.32%	6.65%	+4.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.53%	18.60%	+10.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.51%	22.88%	+11.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.10%	30.33%	+3.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.67%	31.09%	+2.58%

WCBR vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCBR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

WCBR vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

Neither WCBR nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.03%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WCBR and FNGS in my portfolio?

WCBR and FNGS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WCBR or FNGS?

WCBR has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to FNGS (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCBR dropped -52.25% vs FNGS's -48.98%.

Which ETF is better, WCBR or FNGS?

On 5-year performance, FNGS leads with 19.42% vs 8.16% for WCBR. On fees, WCBR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FNGS has been the lower-risk option at 6.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WCBR or FNGS?

Over the 5-year period, FNGS has performed better with a 19.42% return vs 8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WCBR or FNGS?

WCBR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FNGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WCBR or FNGS?

WCBR and FNGS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between WCBR and FNGS?

WCBR is categorized as Technology Equities, while FNGS is Large Cap Growth Equities. WCBR tracks WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index, while FNGS tracks NYSE FANG+ Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WCBR and 0.58% for FNGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.