WCBR vs. FNGS
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS).
WCBR and FNGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WCBR is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Jan 28, 2021. FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019. Both WCBR and FNGS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WCBR or FNGS.
Key characteristics
| WCBR | FNGS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.48% | 11.55% |
| 1Y Return | 48.32% | 58.65% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.06% | 12.31% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.85 | 2.45 |
| Daily Std Dev | 25.34% | 23.73% |
| Max Drawdown | -52.25% | -48.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -18.24% | -5.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCBR and FNGS is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
WCBR vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, WCBR achieves a -2.48% return, which is significantly lower than FNGS's 11.55% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WCBR vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCBR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WCBR vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WCBR vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither WCBR nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.43% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WCBR vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCBR drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCBR and FNGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WCBR vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) is 6.64%, while MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a volatility of 7.97%. This indicates that WCBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.