WCBR vs. FNGS
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS).
WCBR and FNGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WCBR is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Jan 28, 2021. FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019. Both WCBR and FNGS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
WCBR vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WCBR vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund | -9.67% | -1.44% | 11.42% | 66.63% | -41.96% | 6.99% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | -10.61% | 18.64% | 51.99% | 95.24% | -40.32% | 12.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCBR achieves a -9.67% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's -10.61% return.
WCBR
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- -9.67%
- 6M
- -20.38%
- 1Y
- -8.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.11%
- 10Y*
- —
FNGS
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- YTD
- -10.61%
- 6M
- -12.74%
- 1Y
- 20.77%
- 3Y*
- 31.31%
- 5Y*
- 16.15%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WCBR vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCBR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WCBR vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank
WCBR
FNGS
WCBR vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WCBR | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | 0.77 | -1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | 1.32 | -1.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.17 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 0.96 | -1.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | 2.94 | -3.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WCBR | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 | 0.77 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.54 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.91 | -0.89 |
Correlation
The correlation between WCBR and FNGS is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
WCBR vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither WCBR nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.43% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WCBR vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCBR drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCBR and FNGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCBR | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.25% | -48.98% | -3.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.17% | -22.93% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.25% | -48.98% | -3.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.85% | -17.66% | -5.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.57% | -11.02% | -9.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.29% | 7.52% | +3.77% |
Volatility
WCBR vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) has a higher volatility of 10.01% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 8.61%. This indicates that WCBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WCBR | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.01% | 8.61% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.84% | 15.82% | +6.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.52% | 27.04% | +3.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.83% | 29.98% | +2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.99% | 31.34% | +1.65% |