WBIY vs. TMDV
Compare and contrast key facts about WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF (WBIY) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV).
WBIY and TMDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WBIY is a passively managed fund by WBI that tracks the performance of the Solactive Power Factor High Dividend Index. It was launched on Dec 19, 2016. TMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 2019. Both WBIY and TMDV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
WBIY vs. TMDV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WBIY vs. TMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBIY WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF | 6.54% | 13.00% | 8.36% | 13.80% | -0.52% | 28.35% | -8.48% | 2.70% |
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 4.14% | 2.91% | 2.64% | 2.25% | -5.10% | 23.45% | 4.82% | 3.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WBIY achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly higher than TMDV's 4.14% return.
WBIY
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -2.73%
- YTD
- 6.54%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 20.06%
- 3Y*
- 13.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.79%
- 10Y*
- —
TMDV
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -6.06%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 4.03%
- 1Y
- 5.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.21%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WBIY vs. TMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
WBIY has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than TMDV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WBIY vs. TMDV — Risk / Return Rank
WBIY
TMDV
WBIY vs. TMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF (WBIY) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WBIY | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 0.35 | +0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 0.61 | +1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.07 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 0.49 | +1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.81 | 1.42 | +4.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WBIY | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 0.35 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.26 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.31 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between WBIY and TMDV is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WBIY vs. TMDV - Dividend Comparison
WBIY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than TMDV's 2.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBIY WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF | 4.55% | 4.73% | 4.57% | 4.87% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 5.10% | 4.54% | 3.25% | 5.84% | 0.01% |
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 2.63% | 2.65% | 2.70% | 2.45% | 2.46% | 2.14% | 2.28% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WBIY vs. TMDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBIY drawdown since its inception was -48.71%, which is greater than TMDV's maximum drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIY and TMDV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WBIY | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.71% | -33.42% | -15.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.94% | -10.52% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.97% | -17.11% | -3.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.91% | -6.91% | +3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.20% | -5.42% | -1.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 3.65% | -0.21% |
Volatility
WBIY vs. TMDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF (WBIY) is 2.97%, while ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that WBIY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WBIY | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 3.78% | -0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | 8.35% | +1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.51% | 14.86% | +4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 14.43% | +4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 18.78% | +4.01% |